%TI KEYNOTE: Observations from Studying Cognitive Systems in Context
%AU David Woods
%SC Saturday, August 13, 6:00 p.m.

%TI PLENARY: Identifying the Modules of the Mind with fMRI: Imaging the Biological Stages in Visual and Language Processing
%AU Walter Schneider
%AU Steven Small (discussant)
%SC Sunday, August 14, 9-10:30 a.m.

%TI PLENARY: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words -- but that's the Problem
%AU Lila Gleitman
%AU Paul Smolensky (discussant)
%SC Monday, August 15, 9-10:30 a.m.

%TI PLENARY: The Role of Existing Knowledge in Generalization
%AU Michael J. Pazzani
%AU Mark Keane (discussant)
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 9-10:30 a.m.

%TI PLENARY PANEL: Cognitive Science 2004: The Last 10 Years
%AU Tony Simon (moderator)
%AU Joseph Bates
%AU Dedre Gentner
%AU Jim Greeno
%AU Gil Harman
%AU Michael Pazzani
%AU Walter Schneider
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 2-3:30 p.m.

%TI WORKSHOP: Education in Cognitive Science: Planning for the 21st Century
%AU N. Nersessian (chair)
%AU J.L. Kolodner (chair)
%SC Wednesday, August 17, 9-5:30 p.m.

%TI TALK SESSION: Categorization
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB Carbrera, "Functional and Conditional Equivalence:  Conceptual Contributions From Behavior Analysis"
    Pevtzow & Goldstone, "Categorization and the Parsing of Objects"
    Kurbat, Smith, & Medin, "Categorization, Typicality, and Shape Similarity"
    Kruschke & Erickson, "Learning of Rules That Have High-Frequency Exceptions:  New Empirical Data and a Hybrid Connectionist Model"
    Miller, "Modeling Inter-Category Typicality within a Symbolic Search Framework"

%TI TALK SESSION: Reasoning
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB Byrne & Tasso, "Counterfactual Reasoning:  Inferences From Hypothetical Conditionals"
    Melis, "How Mathematicians Prove Theorems"
    Bush, Johnson, & Siefret, "The Implications of Corrections:  Then Why Did You Mention It?"
    Ohlsson & Robin, "The Power of Negative Thinking:  The Central Role of Modus Tollens in Human Cognition"
    Tabachneck, Koedinger, & Nathan, "Toward a Theoretical Account of Strategy Use and Sense-Making in Mathematics Problem Solving"

%TI TALK SESSION: Collaborative Problem Solving
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB Derry & Tookey, "Effects of Collaborative Interaction and Computer Tool Use"
    Engle & Greeno, "Managing Disagreement in Intellectual Conversations:  Coordinating Interpersonal and Conceptual Concerns in the Collaborative Construction of Mathematical Explanations"
    Coulson & Flor, "Rational Choice and Framing Devices:  Argumentation and Computer Programming"
    Liu & Sycara, "Distributed Meeting Scheduling"
    Turner & Eaton, "Handling Unanticipated Events During Collaboration"

%TI TALK SESSION: Representation in Connectionist Networks
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB Dennis, "The Null List Strength Effect in Recognition Memory:  Environmental Statistics and Connectionist Accounts"
    Phillips, "Strong Systematicity Within Connectionism:  The Tensor-Recurrent Network"
    Niklasson & van Gelder, "Can Connectionist Models Exhibit Non-Classical Structure Sensitivity?"
    French, "Dynamically Constraining Connectionist Networks to Produce Distributed, Orthogonal Representations to Reduce Catastrophic Interference"
    Tesar & Smolensky, "Synchronous Firing Variable Binding is a Tensor Product Representation With Temporal Role Vectors"

%TI TALK SESSION: Situated Natural Language
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Carpenter & Alterman, "A Taxonomy for Planned Reading"
    Moorman & Ram, "Integrating Creativity and Reading:  A Functional Approach"
    Peterson, Mahesh, Goel & Eiselt, "KA:  Situating Natural Language Understanding in Design Problem Solving"
    Cassell, Stone, Douville, Prevost, Achorn, Steedman, Badler, & Pelachaud, "Modeling the Interaction Between Speech and Gesture"
    Nelson, Lehman, & John, "Integrating Cognitive Capabilities in a Real-Time Task"

%TI TALK SESSION: Foundations
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Tash, "Formal Rationality and Limited Agents"
    Byrne, "Integrating, Not Debating, Situated Action and Computational Models:  Taking the Environment Seriously"
    van Gelder & Niklasson, "Classicalism and Cognitive Architecture"
    Slezak, "Situated Cognition:  Empirical Issue, `Paradigm Shift' or Conceptual Confusion?"

%TI TALK SESSION: Analogical Reasoning
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Clausner, "Commonsense Knowledge and Conceptual Structure in Container Metaphors"
    Burstein, "Case Age:  Selecting the Best Exemplars for Plausible Reasoning Using Distance in Time or Space"
    Faries & Shlossberg, "The Effect of Similarity on Memory for Prior Problems"
    Gentner & Bowdle, "The Coherence Imbalance Hypothesis:  A Functional Approach to Asymmetry in Comparison"
    Forbus, Ferguson, & Gentner, "Incremental Structure-Mapping"

%TI TALK SESSION: Sentence Processing
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Ferstl, "The Construction-Integration Model:  A Framework for Studying Context Effects in Sentence Processing"
    Stevenson, "A Unified Model of Preference and Recovery Mechanisms in Human Parsing"
    Mahesh & Eiselt, "Uniform Representations for Syntax-Semantics Arbitration"
    Mayberry III & Miikkulainen, "Lexical Disambiguation Based on Distributed Representations of Context Frequency"
    Burgess & Lund, "Multiple Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution:  A Connectionist Account of Psycholinguistic Data"

%TI TALK SESSION: Problem Solving
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB Ahn, Bailenson, & Gordon, "Causal Attribution as Mechanism-Based Story Construction:  An Explanation of the Conjunction Fallacy and the Discounting Principle"
    Recker, Govindaraj, & Vasandani, "Troubleshooting Strategies in a Complex, Dynamical Domain"
    Catrambone, "The Effects of Labels in Examples on Problem Solving Transfer"
    Vollmeyer, Holyoak, & Burns, "Goal Specificity in Hypothesis Testing and Problem Solving"
    Blessing & Ross, "Problem Content Affects the Categorization and Solutions of Problems"

%TI TALK SESSION: Brain Modeling
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB Grunewald & Grossberg, "Binding of Object Representations by Synchronous Cortical Dynamics Explains Temporal Order and Spatial Pooling Data"
    Wan, Touretzky, & Redish, "Computing Goal Locations From Place Codes"
    Bullinaria, "Connectionist Modelling of Spelling"
    Braisby, Franks & Hampton, "On the Psychological Basis for Rigid Designation"

%TI TALK SESSION: Visual Perception
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB Fischer, "Attention Allocation During Movement Preparation"
    Francis & Grossberg, "How Do Representations of Visual Form Organize Our Percepts of Visual Motion?"
    Isaak & Just, "The Curtate Cycloid Illusion:  Cognitive Constraints on the Processing of Rolling Motion"
    Polk & Farah, "A Simple Co-Occurrence Explanation for the Development of Abstract Letter Identities"
    Jin, "Computational Simulation of Depth Perception in the Mammalian Visual System"

%TI TALK SESSION: Mental Models
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB Glasgow, "Array Representations for Model-Based Spatial Reasoning"
    Bara, Bucciarelli, Johnson-Laird, & Lombardo, "Mental Models in Propositional Reasoning"
    Samarapungavan & Wiers, "Do Children Have Epistemic Constructs About Explanatory Frameworks:  Examples From Naive Ideas About the Origin of Species"
    Johnson-Laird & Barres, "When `Or' Means `And':  A Study in Mental Models"
    Moore & Schwartz, "Mental Models for Proportional Reasoning"

%TI TALK SESSION: Learning
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Doane, Sohn, Adams, & McNamara,"Learning from Instruction:  A Comprehension-Based Approach"
    Bielaczyc, Pirolli, & Brown,  "Collaborative Explanations and Metacognition:  Identifying Successful Learning Activities in the Acquisition of Cognitive Skills"
    Leake, "Towards a Computer Model of Memory Search Strategy Learning"
    Cox, "Machines That Forget:  Learning From Retrieval Failure of Mis-Indexed Explanations"
    Sekaran & Sen, "Learning With Friends and Foes"

%TI TALK SESSION: Belief Modeling
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Elio & Pelletier, "The Effect of Syntactic Form on Simple Belief Revisions and Updates"
    Barnden, Helmreich, Iverson, & Stein, "Combining Simulative and Metaphor-Based Reasoning About Beliefs"
    Hewson, "Empirical Evidence Regarding the Folk Psychological Concept of Belief"
    Veale & Keane, "Belief Modelling, Intentionality and Perlocution in Metaphor Comprehension"
    Chalupsky & Shapiro, "SL:  A Subjective, Intensional Logic of Belief"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Speech
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB 
    Roelofs, "On-Line Versus Off-Line Priming of Word-Form Encoding in Spoken Word Production"
    Meijer, "Towards a New Model of Phonological Encoding"
    Markey, "Acoustic-Based Syllabic Representation and Articulatory Gesture Detection:  Prerequisites for Early Childhood Phonetic and Articulatory Development"
    Content & Sternon, "Modelling Retroactive Context Effects in Spoken Word Recognition With a Simple Recurrent Network"
    Harm, Altmann, & Seidenberg, "Using Connectionist Networks to Examine the Role of Prior Constraints in Human Learning"
    Abu-Bakar & Chater, "Distribution and Frequency:  Modelling the Effects of Speaking Rate on Category Boundaries Using a Recurrent Neural Network"
    Gaskell & Marslen-Wilson, "Inference Processes in Speech Perception"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Analogy
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB M. Burstein (discussant)
    Keane, "Adaptation as a Selection Constraint on Analogical Mapping"
    Ohnishi, Suzuki, & Shigemasu, "Similarity by Feature Creation:  Reexamination of the Asymmetry of Similarity"
    Hummel, Melz, Thompson, & Holyoak, "Mapping Hierarchical Structures With Synchrony for Binding:  Preliminary Investigations"
    Wharton & Lange, "Analogical Transfer Through Comprehension and Priming"
    Burns & Holyoak, "Competing Models of Analogy:  ACME Versus Copycat"
    Law, Forbus, and Gentner, "Simulating Similarity-Based Retrieval:  A Comparison of ARCS and MAC/FAC"
    Ferguson, "MAGI:  Analogy-Based Encoding Using Regularity and Symmetry"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Visual Reasoning
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB J. Glasgow (discussant)
    Cheng, "An Empirical Investigation of Law Encoding Diagrams for Instruction"
    Cox, Stenning, & Oberlander, "Graphical Effects in Learning Logic:  Reasoning, Representation and Individual Differences"
    Lindsay, "Understanding Diagrammatic Demonstrations"
    Merrill & Reiser, "Scaffolding Effective Problem Solving Strategies in Interactive Learning Environments"
    Gattis & Holyoak, "How Graphs Mediate Analog and Symbolic Representation"
    Tabachneck, Leonardo, & Simon, "How Does and Expert Use a Graph?  A Model of Visual and Verbal Inferencing in Economics"
    Naraynan, Suwa, & Motoda, "A Study of Diagrammatic Reasoning From Verbal and Gestural Data"
    Clement, "Imagistic Simulation and Physical Intuition in Expert Problem Solving"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Perception
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB H. Narayanan (discussant)
    Thorisson, "Simulated Perceptual Grouping:  An Application to Human-Computer Interaction"
    Gilbert & Richards, "Using Trajectory Mapping to Analyze Musical Intervals"
    Tennenbaum, "Functional Parts"
    McGraw, Rehling, & Goldstone, "Letter Perception:  Toward a Conceptual Approach"
    Schyns & Bulthoff, "Viewpoint Dependence and Face Recognition"
    Olds, "A Connectionist Account of Global Precedence:  Theory and Data"
    McAuley, "Time as Phase:  A Dynamic Model of Time Perception"
    Large, "Models of Metrical Structure in Music"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Learning
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB G. Collins (discussant)
    Oehlmann, Edwards, & Sleeman, "Changing the Viewpoint:  Re-Indexing by Introspective Questioning"
    Suwa & Motoda, "PCLEARN:  A Model for Learning Perceptual-Chunks"
    Seger, "Multiple Learning Mechanisms Within Implicit Learning"
    Jimenez & Cleeremans, "Direct and Indirect Measures of Implicit Learning"
    Cox & Ram, "Failure-Driven Learning as Input Bias"
    Fox & Leake, "Using Introspective Reasoning to Guide Index Refinement in Case-Based Reasoning"
    Van Dyne & Tsatsoulis, "An Experiment to Determine Improvements in Automated Problem Solving in a Complex Problem Domain"
    Hiraki, "Abstraction of Sensory-Motor Features"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Language Acquisition
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB L. Gleitman (discussant)
    Taraban & Taraban, "A Lexical Model of Learning to Read Single Words Aloud"
    Ling, "Predicting Irregular Past Tenses:  Comparing Symbolic and Connectionist Models Against Native English Speakers"
    Peterson & Billman, "Correspondences Between Syntactic Form and Meaning:  From Anarchy to Hierarchy"
    Batali, "Artificial Evolution of Syntactic Aptitude"
    Finch & Chater, "Distributional Bootstrapping:  From Word Class to Proto-Sentence"
    Gillis, Daelemans, & Durieux, "Are Children `Lazy Learners'?  A Comparison of Natural and Machine Learning of Stress"
    Hastings & Lytinen, "Objects, Actions, Nouns, and Verbs"
    Lampinen & Faries, "Levels of Semantic Constraint and Learning Novel Words"
    Cartwright & Brent, "Segmenting Speech Without a Lexicon:  Evidence for a Bootstrapping Model of Lexical Acquisition"
    Westermann & Miikkulainen, "Verb Inflections in German Child Language:  A Connectionist Account"

%TI POSTER+DISCUSSANT SESSION: Syntactic Processing
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB J. Holbrook (discussant)
    Ferstl, "Context Effects in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution:  The Location of Prepositional Phrase Attachment"
    Schutze, "A Connectionist Model of Verb Subcategorization"
    Gibson & Loomis, "A Corpus Analysis of Recency Preference and Predicate Proximity"
    Blackwell & Bates, "Inducing Agrammatic Profiles in Normals"
    Pearlmutter, Daugherty, MacDonald, & Seidenberg, "Modeling the Use of Frequency and Contextual Biases in Sentence Processing"
    Spivey-Knowlton & Tanenhaus, "Immediate Effects of Discourse and Semantic Context in Syntactic Processing:  Evidence from Eye-Tracking"
    Burgess, Tanenhaus, & Hoffman, "Parafoveal and Semantic Effects on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution"

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Scientific Creativity: Multidisciplinary Perspectives
%AU N. Nersessian (chair)
%AU J. Clement
%AU K. Dunbar
%AU R. Jones
%AU R. Tweney
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Animal Cognition
%AU A. Francis (chair)
%AU D. Rumbaugh
%AU M. Tomasello
%AU D. Washburn
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Learning New Features of Representation
%AU R.L. Goldstone (chair)
%AU P. Schyns (chair)
%AU B. French
%AU D.L. Medin
%AU M. Mozer
%AU J.-P. Thibaut
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Cognitive Science Meets Cognitive Engineering
%AU R. Catrambone (chair)
%AU S.T. Dumais
%AU J. Elkerton
%AU B.E. John
%AU M.G. Shafto
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Visual Reasoning in Discovery, Instruction and Problem Solving
%AU N.H. Narayanan (chair)
%AU M. Hegarty
%AU R. Hall
%AU N. Nersessian
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: The Role of Cases in Learning
%AU T. Koschmann (chair)
%AU A. Collins
%AU K. Holyoak
%AU G. Klein
%AU J. Kolodner
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30

%TI SYMPOSIUM: Collaborative Knowledge
%AU P. Thagard (chair)
%AU K. Dunbar
%AU E. Hutchins
%AU G. Olson
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30

%TI Causal Attribution As Mechanism-Based Story Construction: An Explanation Of The Conjunction Fallacy And The Discounting Principle
%AU Woo-kyoung Ahn
%AU Jeremy Bailenson
%AU Brian Gordon
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 9-14
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB We propose that causal attribution involves constructing a coherent
    story using mechanism information (i.e., the processes underlying
    the relationship between the cause and the effect). This processing
    account can explain both the conjunction effect (i.e., conjunctive
    explanations being rated more probable than their components) and
    the discounting effect (i.e., the effect of one cause being
    discounted when another cause is already known to be true).  In the
    current experiment, both effects occurred with mechanism-based
    explanations but not with covariation-based explanations in which
    the cause-effect relationship was phrased in terms of covariations
    without referring to mechanisms. We discuss why the current results
    pose difficulties for previous attribution models in Psychology and
    Artificial Intelligence.

%TI Distribution and frequency: Modelling the effects of speaking rate on category boundaries using a recurrent neural network 
%AU Mukhlis Abu-Bakar
%AU Nick Chater
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 3-8
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB We describe a recurrent neural network model of rate effects on the
    syllable-initial voicing distinction, specified by voice-onset-time
    (VOT).  The stimuli were stylized /bi/ and /pi/ syllables covarying
    in VOT and syllable duration.  Network performance revealed a
    systematic rate effect: as syllable duration increases, the category
    boundary moves toward longer VOT values, mirroring human
    performance.  Two factors underlie this effect: the range of
    training stimuli with each VOT and syllable duration, and their
    frequency of occurrence.  The latter influence was particularly
    strong, consistent with exemplar-based accounts of human category
    formation.

%TI Mental Models in Propositional Reasoning
%AU B.G. Bara
%AU M. Bucciarelli
%AU P.N. Johnson-Laird
%AU V. Lombardo
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 15-20
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB A cognitive account of propositional reasoning must consider both the
    representation of the propositions (premises and states of affairs) and
    the context in which the propositions are used. This paper is concerned
    with reasoning processes involving three different connectives
    (conjunctive, conditional and disjunctive connectives) in three different
    tasks (accomplishing a request for action expressed by a premise, judging
    a state of affairs as true or false with respect to a premise, drawing an
    inference from two premises).  Our claim is that the ability to reason
    with connectives is explained in terms of construction and manipulation
    of mental models. We present a computer model that takes as input the
    modelistic representations of the premises and the specific state of
    affairs, compares such models and gives rise to a series of model
    manipulations in order to produce a result, i.e. an action, a judgement
    or an inference. A computer program reproduces the performances of
    subjects of different age groups, predicting both correct and erroneous
    inferences.

%TI Combining Simulative and Metaphor-Based Reasoning about Beliefs
%AU John A. Barnden 
%AU Stephen Helmreich
%AU Eric Iverson
%AU Gees C. Stein
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 21-26
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB An unprecedented combination of simulative and metaphor-based
    reasoning about beliefs is achieved in an AI system, ATT-Meta.  Much
    mundane discourse about beliefs uses conceptual metaphors (e.g.,
    MIND AS CONTAINER) productively, and ATT-Meta's metaphor-based
    reasoning accordingly leads to crucial discourse comprehension
    decisions.  ATT-Meta's non-metaphorical mode of belief reasoning
    includes simulative reasoning (SR).  In ATT-Meta, metaphor-based
    reasoning can block and otherwise influence the course of SR.  Also,
    ATT-Meta can nest SR and metaphor-based reasoning within themselves
    and each other.  As well as currently allowing ATT-Meta to
    simulatively reason about beliefs about beliefs ..., the nesting
    will in the near future allow the system to handle chained
    metaphors, ascribe its own metaphor-based reasoning to other agents,
    and apply simulative reasoning to purely metaphorical agents.

%TI Artificial Evolution of Syntactic Aptitude
%AU John Batali
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 27-32
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB Populations of simple recurrent neural networks were subject to
    simulations of evolution where the selection criterion was the
    ability of a network to learn to recognize strings from context free
    grammars.  After a number of generations, networks emerged that use
    the activation values of the units feeding their recurrent
    connections to represent the depth of embedding in a string.
    Networks inherited innate biases to accurately learn members of a
    class of related context-free grammars, and, while learning, passed
    through periods during which exposure to spurious input interfered
    with their subsequent ability to learn a grammar.

%TI Interactive Model-Driven Case Adaptation for Instructional Software Design
%AU Benjamin Bell
%AU Smadar Kedar
%AU Ray Bareiss
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 33-38
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Research in case-based design has demonstrated some capability to retrieve
    relevant designs and to adapt them automatically to satisfy new design
    constraints. However, some domains are less amenable to automated
    adaptation, particularly when the cases are very complex and when
    relationships among the design components are difficult to express
    formally. The design of interactive learning environments is one such
    domain. We describe a case-based approach to instructional software design
    which utilizes interactive, model-driven case adaptation. Our model for
    computer-based instruction is Goal-Based Scenarios. We describe a tool,
    Goal-Based Scenario Builder, which supports interactive adaptation of
    instructional software using the model, and illustrate its use in adapting
    an example case of a successful instructional software program, Sickle Cell
    Counselor.

%TI Collaborative Explanations and Metacognition: Identifying Successful Learning Activities in the Acquisition of Cognitive Skills  
%AU K. Bielaczyc
%AU P. Pirolli
%AU A. Brown
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 39-44
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Individual differences in collaborative explanations during
    learning were analyzed to determine effects on problem solving.
    Twenty-five university students with no prior programming experience
    worked through a sequence of programming lessons.  For the Target
    lesson, subjects studied instructional texts and examples in either
    mixed performance-level dyads (collaborative dyad group) or
    individually (individual group) prior to individual programming
    activities.  The collaborative dyad subjects were divided into equal
    sized groups of high-benefit and low-benefit dyad subjects based on
    Target lesson programming performance.  Between-group analyses of the
    characteristics of the explanations generated by high-benefit and
    low-benefit dyad subjects were investigated, including (a) explanation
    and metacognitive strategies, (b) content of elaborations, and (c)
    manner of generating elaborations.  High-benefit dyad subjects were
    found to generate both a higher quantity and higher quality of
    elaborations.  These results are compared to findings from prior
    research on the self-explanation processes of solo learners.             

%TI Inducing Agrammatic Profiles in Normals  
%AU Arshavir Blackwell
%AU Elizabeth Bates
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 45-50
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB The selective vulnerability of morphology in agrammatic aphasia is
    often interpreted as evidence that closed-class items reside in a
    particular part of the brain (i.e., Broca9s area); thus, damage to a
    part of the language processor maps onto behavior in a transparent
    fashion.  We propose that the selective vulnerability of grammatical
    morphemes in receptive processing may be the result of decrements in
    overall processing capacity, and not the result of a selective
    lesion.  We demonstrate agrammatic profiles in healthy adults who
    have their processing capacity diminished by engaging in a secondary
    task during testing.  Our results suggest that this selective
    profile does not necessarily indicate the existence of a distinct
    sub-system specialized for the implicated aspects of syntax, but
    rather may be due to the vulnerability of these forms in the face of
    global resource diminution, at least in grammaticality judgment.

%TI Problem Content Affects the Categorization and Solutions of Problems
%AU Stephen B. Blessing
%AU Brian H. Ross
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 51-55
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB In many domains, the content of a problem (i.e., its surface cover
    story) provides useful clues as to the type of problem it is and its
    solution. Three experiments examined this role of problem content on
    the problem categorization and solution of algebra word problems
    with experienced subjects, by manipulating only the content of the
    problems.  When a problem's content was highly correlated with its
    deep structure (e.g., a content of cars driving for a
    distance-time-rate problem), people were able to categorize the
    problem after seeing a smaller portion of it compared to a baseline
    with contents uncorrelated to the problem deep structure. In
    addition, for more complex problems in which irrelevant information
    had been added, problem solving performance was higher and people
    showed greater sensitivity to the relevance of the information. When
    a problem's content suggested a different (inappropriate) type of
    problem, people required a greater part of the problem to categorize
    it and were slower and less accurate at solving the problem. These
    results suggest that content may be influential even for experienced
    problem solvers.

%TI On the Psychological Basis for Rigid Designation
%AU Nick Braisby
%AU Bradley Franks
%AU James Hampton
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 56-60
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Kripke (1972) and Putnam (1975a; 1975b) have argued forcefully for
    the philosophical view of word meaning known as rigid designation.
    While certain psychological studies have appeared to offer this view
    support (Keil, 1986; Rips, 1989), we argue that these have not
    provided an exhaustive evaluation.  In particular, the original
    discussions of Kripke and Putnam reveal that their view rests on an
    explicit appeal to intuition concerning word use in a range of
    different scenarios.  The study reported here investigates word use
    under three such types of scenarios, for a variety of natural kind
    terms, by investigating subjects' judgements of truth or falsity for
    a range of statement types.  We argue that the results obtained
    indicate that the intuition on which rigid designation rests is not
    one which is generally true of agents' language use.  Further, we
    obtain patterns of apparent contradiction which appear strictly
    inconsistent with rigid designation and which require an account of
    word meaning which allows that the sense of words may vary
    systematically with context (Franks & Braisby, 1990).

%TI The Theory-Ladenness of Data: An Experimental Demonstration
%AU William F. Brewer
%AU Clark A. Chinn
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 61-65
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Most philosophers of science now believe that scientific data are
    theory laden, i.e., the evaluation of data is influenced by prior
    theoretical beliefs.  Although there is historical and psychological
    evidence that is consistent with the theory-laden position,
    experimental evidence is needed to directly test whether prior
    beliefs influence the evaluation of scientific data.  In a fully
    counterbalanced design, one group of subjects received evidence that
    dinosaurs were cold-blooded, and another group of subjects received
    evidence that dinosaurs were warm-blooded.  The subjects reported a
    strong belief in whichever theory they had read about.  Then
    subjects were presented with a piece of data that supported one
    theory and contradicted the other theory.  The identical piece of
    data was rated as more believable when it was consistent with the
    subject's theory than when it was inconsistent.  These results
    provide clear support for the position that scientific data are
    theory laden.

%TI Kant and Cognitive Science
%AU Andrew Brook
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 66-71
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Some of Kant's ideas about the mind have had a huge influence on
    cognitive science, in particular his view that sensory input has to be
    worked up using concepts or concept-like states and his conception of the
    mind as a system of cognitive functions. Other ideas of Kant's about the
    mind have not been assimilated into cognitive science, including
    important ideas about synthesis, mental unity and consciousness and
    self-consciousness. Work of P. M. and P. S. Churchland, Dennett,
    Flanagan, Jerry Fodor, Patricia Kitcher, Martindale, Sellars, and
    Treisman is briefly discussed.

%TI A Connectionist Model of the Development of Velocity, Time, and Distance Concepts
%AU David Buckingham
%AU Thomas R. Shultz
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 72-77
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Connectionist simulations of children's acquisition of velocity (v),
    time (t), and distance (d) concepts were conducted using a
    generative algorithm, cascade-correlation (Fahlman & Lebiere, 1990).
    Diagnosis of network rules were consistent with the developmental
    course of children's concepts (Wilkening, 1981, 1982) and predicted
    some new stages as well.  Networks integrated the defining
    dimensions of the concepts first by identity rules (e.g., v = d),
    then additive rules (e.g., v = d-t), and finally multiplicative
    rules (e.g., v = d/t).  Psychological effects of differential memory
    demands were also simulated.  It is argued that cascade-correlation
    implements an explicit mechanism of developmental change involving
    incremental learning and qualitative increases in representational
    power.

%TI Connectionist Modelling of Spelling
%AU John A. Bullinaria
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 78-83
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB We present a new connectionist model of human spelling and
    investigate some of its properties.  Although based on Sejnowski &
    Rosenberg's (1987) NETtalk model of reading, it requires no
    pre-processing of the training data to align the phonemes and
    letters.  The model achieves 100% performance on the training data
    (2837 monosyllabic words including many irregular words) and has a
    generalization performance of about 89%.  Under appropriate
    conditions it exhibits symptoms similar to developmental surface
    dyslexia and acquired surface dysgraphia.  However, its inability to
    account for phonological dysgraphia and lexical decision leads us to
    believe that it is a promising candidate for the rule based part of
    a dual route model but not a complete model of spelling on its own.

%TI Internal Representations of a Connectionist Model of Reading Aloud
%AU John A. Bullinaria
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 84-89
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9 
%AB We use hierarchical cluster analysis, principal component analysis,
    multi-dimensional scaling and discriminant analysis to investigate
    the internal representations learnt by a recent connectionist model
    of reading aloud.  The learning trajectories of these
    representations may help us understand reading development in
    children and the results of naming latency experiments in adults.
    Studying the effects of network damage on these representations
    seems to provide insight into the mechanisms underlying acquired
    surface dyslexia.  The discussion of the various techniques used may
    also prove useful in analysing the functioning of other
    connectionist systems.

%TI Multiple Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: A Connectionist Account of Psycholinguistic Data
%AU Curt Burgess
%AU Kevin Lund
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 90-95
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB We implement a constraint satisfaction connectionist style model that
    accounts for data from three psycholinguistics experiments investigating
    the gardenpath effect with reduced relative constructions.  Normative
    data was collected on the stimuli used in experiments by Burgess and
    Tanenhaus (1992) and Ferreira and Clifton (1986) and this data served as
    the input for the simulation.  We have demonstrated with this set of
    simulations that a plausible theoretical framework for a range of these
    results is a hierarchical connectionist network which is sensitive to a
    number of constraints inherent in the input stimuli.  The model accounts
    for the top-down effect of context, the contribution of the bottom-up
    morphological frequency asymmetry of the verb, and the probabilistic
    nature of the disambiguating preposition.  These effects are sensitive to
    the timecourse of processing as well. The pattern of results from the
    psycholinguistic data suggest that syntactic processing is a confluence
    of multiple constraints that represent both bottom-up and top-down
    influences in processing.  These results are incompatible with a
    deterministic parsing model.  The hierarchical connectionist style model
    presented in this paper is sensitive to the range of constraints
    discussed above and is offered as a more adaptive theoretical model that
    can capture the domain of effects found in the literature encompassing
    local syntactic ambiguity resolution.

%TI Parafoveal and Semantic Effects on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
%AU Curt Burgess
%AU Michael K. Tanenhaus
%AU Miriam Hoffman
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 96-99
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Subjects were presented with strongly past-participle biased sentences,
    The portrait sketched by the tree was very beautiful, in a self-paced
    reading time task. Sentences were displayed two words at a time, (e.g.,
    The portrait / sketched by ...) so that the verb and disambiguating
    preposition were read together.  In Experiment 1, a set of materials
    constructed to minimize the past-tense bias with an inanimate NP was
    compared with a less constraining set of sentences.  The syntactic
    gardenpath usually associated with the reduced-relative construction was
    not present with the more constraining materials.  In Experiment 2, using
    the more constraining materials, preposition length was manipulated so
    that subjects read sentences with both short (i.e., by) and long (i.e.,
    underneath) prepositions. No syntactic gardenpaths occurred with
    sentences with the past-participle bias and short prepositions; however,
    when the same sentences were read with the long prepositions - the
    syntactic gardenpath was present. This result is inconsistent with a
    deterministic parser. We expand on our previous proposals that the parser
    must be able to take into account both semantic and verb-form
    information, as well as, parafoveal disambiguating information in the
    form of the preposition.

%TI Competing Models of Analogy: ACME Versus Copycat
%AU Bruce D. Burns
%AU Keith J. Holyoak
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 97-100
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB ACME and Copycat have been viewed as competing models of analogy
    making.  Mitchell (1993) makes three major criticisms of ACME in
    arguing for Copycat's superiority: that because ACME considers all
    syntactically possible mappings it is psychologically implausible
    and computationally infeasible; that its representations are rigid
    and hand-tailored for each problem; and that ACME's representations
    are semantically empty.  To evaluate these criticisms we applied
    ACME to simulating problems in the only domain addressed by Copycat,
    letter-string analogies such as, "If abc is changed into abd, how
    would you change kji in the same way?"  Using representations that
    include only knowledge available to Copycat, ACME generated the most
    common solutions that people and Copycat produce.  In addition, ACME
    was able to generate some solutions produced by people but that are
    impossible for Copycat, demonstrating that in some respects ACME is
    a more flexible analogical reasoner than is Copycat.  These
    simulations answer each of Mitchell's criticisms of ACME.  ACME can
    incorporate domain-relevant knowledge to allow a principled
    reduction in the number of mappings considered; it can generate
    novel representations based on its domain-general constraints; and
    it can incorporate semantic content into its representations.  In
    addition, ACME has the advantage of being applicable to many
    different domains.

%TI Case Age: Selecting the Best Exemplars for Plausible Reasoning Using Distance in Time or Space
%AU Mark H. Burstein
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 106-111
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB The age of a case (in the CBR sense) is the amount of time that has
    elapsed between the time that the case originally occurred and the time
    of the current reasoning activity.  People engaged in plausible reasoning
    tasks will, under appropriate circumstances, use the age of retrieved
    prior cases to filter and discard them, or to select among alternatives
    by their recency.  This paper examines how the age of a case (and its
    spatial analog) are used by people in plausible reasoning and case-based
    reasoning tasks. I will argue that (1) the ate of a retrieved case is an
    important factor in relevance judgements for certain kinds of inferences.
    (2) When case age is relevant, more recent cases are usually, but not
    always, preferred to older ones (the "all other things being equal"
    caveat).  Finally, I will argue that, somewhat surprisingly, (3) case age
    cannot be used as in index into memory given some commonly held
    assumptions about the nature of the retrieval process because it varies
    with the time of retrieval.  This limits its use to post-retrieval
    processes, such as the filtering of already retrieved cases.

%TI The Implications of Corrections:  Then Why Did You Mention It?
%AU Julie G. Bush
%AU Hollyn M. Johnson
%AU Colleen M. Seifert
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 112-117
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB How can misreported information be effectively corrected?  Wilkes
    and Leatherbarrow (1988) found that people relied upon invalidated
    information to answer questions despite their awareness of its
    inaccuracy, a phenomenon called the "continued influence effect"
    (Johnson & Seifert, in press).  But corrections in which an
    assertion is made and then denied (e.g., "X is true ... actually, X
    is untrue") may violate important conversational assumptions.  Grice
    (1967/1989) and others have argued that people expect speakers to
    offer only information that is both truthful and conversationally
    relevant; thus, people may seek interpretations for corrections that
    will incorporate both the literal meaning and the conversational
    implications of the contradictory statements.  Our hypothesis was
    that corrections would be more successful when they explained why
    the original information was asserted.  An empirical study showed
    that corrections that accounted for conversational implications
    (e.g., "X, which had originally been believed because of Y, is
    actually untrue") could more effectively reduce the continued use of
    discredited information.  Additionally, the results show that
    reiterating the literal content of a correction may actually be
    perceived as implying that the correction statement should be
    disbelieved.  Since the conversational implications of corrections
    critically shape comprehension, their examination is crucial in
    domains (such as courtrooms, newspapers, and classrooms) where
    informational updates frequently occur.

%TI Integrating, Not Debating, Situated Action and Computational Models: Taking the Environment Seriously
%AU Michael D. Byrne
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 118-123
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB A recent issue of the journal Cognitive Science (1993, vol. 17, no.
    1) centered around a debate between two "camps" within the field,
    the "situated action" (or SA) camp and the "traditional," symbol
    processing camp. Though the debate in that journal suggests that, at
    some levels, symbol processing and SA are incommensurable, this
    paper disputes that view. If the message of the SA community is
    taken to be that traditional approaches neglect the importance of
    the environment, then not only is the message an important one, but
    the typical symbol processing system is guilty as charged. However,
    this does not mean that, in principle, symbol processing systems
    must have this limitation. The two approaches can work hand-in-hand
    to produce more general and more accurate computational models. A
    framework of building models of the environment and having models of
    cognitive agents work with those models is proposed, from which a
    smooth integration of SA and symbol processing is not only possible,
    but desirable. The framework proposed here is instantiated with a
    production system called S-CAPS, and the efficacy of building models
    of both the problem-solver and the problem environment is
    demonstrated.

%TI Counterfactual Reasoning: Inferences from Hypothetical Conditionals
%AU Ruth M.J. Byrne   
%AU Alessandra Tasso
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 124-129
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB Hypothetical reasoning -- thinking about what might happen in the
    future or what might have happened in the past -- enables us to go
    beyond factual reality.  We suggest that human reasoners construct a
    more explicit mental representation of hypothetical conditionals,
    such as, If Linda were in Dublin then Cathy would be in Galway, than
    of factual conditionals, such as, if Linda is in Dublin then Cathy
    is in Galway.  When people think about the factual conditional, they
    keep in mind the affirmative situation -- Linda is in Dublin, Cathy
    is in Galway, and they maintain only an implicit awareness that
    there may be alternatives to this situation.  In contrast, when they
    think about the hypothetical conditional, they keep in mind not only
    the affirmative situation, but also the presupposed negative one
    (Linda is not in Dublin, Cathy is not in Galway). The postulated
    differences in mental representations lead us to expect differences
    in the frequency of inferences that people make from the two sorts
    of conditionals, and we report the results of an experiment that
    corroborates this prediction. The psychological data have
    implications for philosophical and linguistic accounts of
    counterfactual conditionals, and for artificial intelligence
    programs designed to reason hypothetically.these results for
    computational models of analogy are discussed.

%TI Functional and Conditional Equivalence:  Conceptual Contributions from Behavior Analysis
%AU Angel Cabrera
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 130-135
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11:00am-12:30pm
%AB Behavior analysis has recently developed a new paradigm for the
    study of categorization and language based on the mathematical
    notion of equivalence.  Inspired by this paradigm, this paper
    presents a definitional framework that could be relevant for several
    of the phenomena under study in Cognitive Science.  First,
    categories are viewed as classes of functional equivalence.  By
    doing so, results from behavior analysis and cognitive psychology
    seem to converge towards an experience-based interpretation of
    category basicness.  Second, conditional equivalence is proposed as
    the basis for symbol-meaning and symbol-symbol relationships.
    Transfer of function through conditional links is suggested as the
    mechanism of connection between language and other aspects of
    cognition.  The adoption and extension of these functionalist
    formalisms provides us with significant methodological, conceptual
    and even empirical advantages.

%TI Lexical Segmentation: the role of sequential statistics in supervised and un-supervised models
%AU Paul Cairns
%AU Richard Shillcock
%AU Nick Chater
%AU Joe Levy
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 136-141
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB The use of transitional probabilities between phonetic segments as a
    cue for segmenting words from English speech is investigated. We
    develop a series of class-based n-gram and feature-based neural
    network models that enable us to quantify the contribution of
    low-level statistics to word boundary prediction. Training data for
    our models is representative of genuine conversational speech: a
    phonological transcription of the London-Lund corpus. These simple
    models can be purely bottom-up and hence valid bootstrapping models
    of infant development. We go on to demonstrate how the boostrapping
    models mimic the Metrical Segmentation Strategy of Cutler and Norris
    (1988), and we discuss the implications of this result.

%TI A Taxonomy for Planned Reading
%AU Tamitha Carpenter
%AU Richard Alterman
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 142-147
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Early computational models of reading treated reading as a disembodied
    process of examining a piece of text sequentially and in its entirety.
    More recent work has shown that reading does not always occur
    sequentially, and that embodying reading in a larger activity is
    beneficial to the reading process.  This paper will present a
    cognitive model that uses reading plans to read instructional text
    non-sequentially and in the context of an activity.  To support this
    model, we will discuss: 1) a taxonomy of reading plans and their
    functions; 2) a taxonomy of reading sub-plans and their roles; and 3)
    procedures for adapting reading plans.  In addition, the results of a
    protocol study are given which support planned reading as a cognitive
    model.

%TI Modelling the Interaction between Speech and Gesture
%AU Justine Cassell
%AU Matthew Stone
%AU Brett Douville
%AU Scott Prevost
%AU Brett Achorn
%AU Mark Steedman
%AU Norm Badler
%AU Catherine Pelachaud
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 153-158
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB This paper describes an implemented system that generates spoken
    dialogue, including speech, intonation, and gesture, using two
    copies of an identical program that differ only in knowledge of the
    world and which must cooperate to accomplish a goal.  The output of
    the dialogue generation is used to drive a three-dimensional
    interactive animated model -- two graphic figures on a computer
    screen who speak and gesture according to the rules of the system.
    The system is based upon a formal, predictive and explanatory theory
    of the gesture-speech relationship.  A felicitous outcome is a
    working system to realize autonomous animated conversational agents
    for virtual reality and other purposes, and a tool for investigating
    the relationship between speech and gesture.

%TI The Effects of Labels in Examples on Problem Solving Transfer
%AU Richard Catrambone
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 159-164
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB It is hypothesized that labels in examples help learners group a set
    of steps and to try to explain why those steps belong together.  The
    result of these grouping and self-explanation processes might be the
    formation of a subgoal.  It is conjectured that the meaningfulness
    of the label itself might not be critical in order for the grouping
    and self-explanation processes to occur.  This conjecture is
    supported in an experiment in which subjects studying examples in
    probability that had steps labeled transferred to novel problems
    more successfully than subjects whose examples did not contain
    labels.  Furthermore, subjects who saw less meaningful labels
    transferred as successfully as subjects studying examples with more
    meaningful labels.  Thus, it appears that the meaningfulness of the
    label does not seem to affect subgoal formation as much as the
    presence of a label.  This result supports the interpretation that
    subgoal learning is affected by labels and that labels produce this
    benefit by helping learners group the steps into a purposeful unit,
    perhaps through a self-explanation process.

%TI SL: A Subjective, Intensional Logic of Belief
%AU Hans Chalupsky
%AU Stuart C. Shapiro
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 165-170
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Logics of belief are usually either quite complex, unintuitive, make
    overly idealistic assumptions, or all of the above, because they
    have to cope with the unusual characteristics of the belief operator
    (relation, predicate). Some of these problematic characteristics are
    referential opacity, the possible falsehood of objects of belief,
    belief recursion, identification of referents from outside of the
    belief operator in quantification contexts, etc. The difficulties
    faced by traditional logical treatments seem to stem mainly from the
    fact that an essentially subjective, intensional phenomenon gets
    analyzed from an objective, outside observer's point of view in an
    extensional, logical framework.  As an alternative, we propose a
    subjective, intensional logic SL, which takes seriously the usual
    characterization of belief as a propositional attitude, that is, in
    SL belief is treated as a relation between an agent and a
    proposition (an intensional object). As results we gain technical
    simplicity and a simple, intuitive semantics for belief sentences.

%TI An Empirical Investigation Of Law Encoding Diagrams For Instruction
%AU Peter C-H. Cheng
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 171-176
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Law Encoding Diagrams, LEDs, are knowledge representations that
    correctly encode systems of one or more laws using the geometric
    and/or the topological structure of diagrams.  In an instructional
    role, LEDs aim to focus learning on the formal relations defined by
    the correct laws, whilst using diagrammatic representations to aid
    comprehension.  LEDs can be viewed as intermediate representations
    that aim to bridge the conceptual gulf between abstract laws and the
    behaviour of phenomena.  It is anticipated LEDs will be adopted as
    key models in the foundation of expertise.  This paper describes an
    investigation in which LEDs for momentum and energy conservation
    were used for instruction.  The LEDs were implemented in a computer
    based discovery learning environment and the subjects given only
    minimal instruction on their use in problem solving.  However, half
    the subjects used the LEDs for successful post-test solutions of
    different classes of problem and exhibited strategies that were
    expert-like, in marked contrast to their novice-like pre-test
    performance.

%TI Are Scientific Theories that Predict Data More Believable than Theories that Retrospectively Explain Data? A Psychological Investigation
%AU Clark A. Chinn
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 177-182
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Philosophers have disagreed about whether theories that make
    successful predictions are more believable than theories that merely
    explain data that have already been discovered.  Predictivists
    believe that theories that make successful predictions have an edge
    over theories that offer only retrospective explanations of the same
    data.  Nonpredictivists maintain that whether a theory predicts data
    or explains data retrospectively is irrelevant to the believability
    of the theory.  The purpose of this paper is to report on three
    psychological experiments designed to determine whether
    undergraduates behave as predictivists or nonpredictivists when they
    evaluate theories.  Results indicate that subjects behaved as
    nonpredictivists when one theory predicted a body of data and a
    second theory was devised later to explain the same data
    retrospectively.  However, subjects behaved as predictivists in the
    situation in which a theory retreated in the face of anomalous data
    by adding an auxiliary hypothesis; for instance, theories that
    predicted data by adding the necessary auxiliary hypotheses before
    the data came in were more believable than theories that added the
    auxiliary hypothesis in reaction to the data.  These results suggest
    that cognitive models of theory choice that assume that people are
    nonpredictivists may require modification.

%TI The Architecture of Intuition: Converging Views from Physics Education and Linguistics
%AU Ming Ming Chiu
%AU Joshua Gutwill
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 183-188
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB This paper analyzes two converging views of the architecture of
    intuition.  A. diSessa and L. Talmy, working independently in
    different fields (physics education and linguistics), have
    formulated strikingly similar theories of intuition.  Both view
    people's intuitions about forces as simple pieces of knowledge
    organized heterarchically.  However, Talmy's force dynamic patterns
    have more sys tem-wide structure than diSessa's phenomenological
    primi tives.  Using these primitives, people generate common sense
    explanations for a wide variety of situations.  Moreover, people may
    build upon these intuitions while studying formal disciplines such
    as physics.  However, several primitives directly conflict with
    physics concepts and may account for resilient misconceptions.
    Finally, intuitions may also provide the basis for understanding so
    cial and psychological phenomena.

%TI Commonsense Knowledge and Conceptual Structure in Container Metaphors
%AU Timothy C. Clausner
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 189-194
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Cognitive grammar provides an analytic framework in which the
    semantic value of linguistic expressions is characterized relative
    to domains of presupposed knowledge. Cognitive metaphor theory holds
    that metaphorical language involves a mapping of conceptual
    structure from a source domain to a target domain. Containers are
    one such pervasive structure.  This investigation proposes a
    detailed representation for the domain CONTAINER and applies it in
    the analysis of metaphorical expressions mapping CONTAINER onto
    target domains ARGUMENT and LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION. Each source
    domain word is analyzed with respect to which aspects of the
    CONTAINER domain structure it refers, and whether it refers to a 2D
    or 3D bounded region. The pattern of aspects mapped suggest that
    spatial containment, content, and material container object comprise
    major aspects of the 3D CONTAINER domain. The target domains are
    demonstrated to be structured according this container organization.
    The results demonstrate that cognitive semantic analysis can reveal
    specific structures of commonsense knowledge which are prerequisite
    for language use.

%TI A Descriptive Model of Question Asking During Story Acquistion Interviews
%AU Chip Cleary
%AU Ray Bareiss
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 195-200
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB In this paper, we provide a taxonomy of the processes which people
    use to generate questions for a type of interviewing task.
    Specifically, we analyze "story acquisition interviews" in which the
    interviewer is a knowledge engineer who asks questions of a domain
    expert to acquire material for a conversational hypermedia system.
    Such interviews have proven to be surprisingly difficult to conduct
    successfully. We have identified a number of "local" strategies
    which successful interviewers use to develop coherent, interesting
    sequences of questions and we have positioned these strategies
    within a model which describes the global interviewing process. This
    descriptive model is an initial step towards a methodology
    prescribing how to perform these interviews effectively.

%TI Imagistic Simulation and Physical Intuition in Expert Problem Solving
%AU John Clement
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 201-206
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB This paper discusses evidence from thinking aloud case studies indicating
    that part of the knowledge used by expert problem solvers consists of
    concrete physical intuitions rather than abstract verbal principles or
    equations.  One purpose of the paper is to provide empirical
    documentation of behaviors such as spontaneous references to using
    intuition, depictive hand motions, and dynamic imagery reports.  Although
    the role of imagery in lower level tasks is becoming more accepted, we
    currently lack sufficient empirical evidence for its use in higher level
    thinking.  In order to account for cases where subjects appear to be
    "running a simulation" of an event on the basis of a physical intuition,
    a model is presented in which a somewhat general and permanent perceptual
    motor schema controls a more specific and temporary image of a situation.
    This process is termed "imagistic simulation".  The imagery can be
    kinesthetic as well as visual, and dynamic rather than static, suggesting
    the involvement of the motor system.  Although rules for making
    inferences from networks of causal relations have been studied, we lack
    models which analyze the nature of mental simulations underlying a single
    causal relationship.  Such physical intuitions and simulations may
    provide basic building blocks for constructing visualizable models in
    science.

%TI Modeling Retroactive Context Effects in Spoken Word Recognition with a Simple Recurrent Network
%AU Alain Content
%AU Pascal Sternon
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 207-212
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB We present a new variant of a simple recurrent network to model
    auditory word recognition in continuous speech and address the issue
    of lexical segmentation. Simulations based on small word sets show
    that the system provides a near-optimal solution to the opposite
    constraints of speed, which requires that lexical processing be
    immediate, and reliability, which imposes that identification
    decisions be postponed until unambiguous information is available.
    Contrary to an often-heard statement, the simulations show that the
    existence of embedded words is not incompatible with the notion of
    continuous on-line lexical processing.

%TI Individual Differences and Predictive Validity in Student Modeling        
%AU Albert T. Corbett
%AU John R. Anderson       
%AU Valerie H. Carver
%AU Scott A. Brancolini
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 213-218
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB This paper evaluates the student modeling procedure in the ACT
    Programming Tutor (APT).  APT is a practice environment that
    provides assistance to students as they write short programs.  The
    tutor is constructed around a set of several hundred programming
    rules called the ideal student model, that allows the program to
    solve exercises along with the student.  As the student works the
    tutor maintains an estimate of the probability that the student has
    learned the rules in the ideal model, in a process we call knowledge
    tracing.  The cognitive model, and the learning and performance
    assumptions that underlie knowledge tracing are described.  The
    assumptions that underlie knowledge tracing also yield performance
    predictions.  These predictions provide a good fit to students'
    performance in completing tutor exercises, but a more important
    issue is how well the model predicts students' performance outside
    the tutor environment.  A previous study showed that the model
    provides a good fit to average posttest performance across students,
    but is less sensitive to individual differences.  This paper
    describes a method of individualizing learning and performance
    estimates on-line in the tutor and assesses the validity of the
    resulting performance predictions.

%TI Rational choice and framing devices:  Argumentation and computer programming
%AU Seana Coulson
%AU Nick V. Flor
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 219-224
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB The argumentative discourse of computer programmers engaged in a
    collaborative programming task were analyzed as instances of ecologically
    valid reasoning behavior.  Teams of expert programmers were brought into
    a laboratory setting to work cooperatively on a software maintenance
    task.  Arguments which occurred spontaneously in the course of the task
    were examined with respect to: (a) their effect on task performance; and
    (b) to reveal the sorts of inferential machinery programmers use when
    they reason with one another.  Arguments were found to be important in
    the formulation of plans as well as the negotiation of strategic
    priorities with respect to the task.  Pragmatic features of the
    programmers' discourse revealed extensive use of framing devices whose
    efficacy depended upon interpretation in the context of linked pragmatic
    scales.

%TI Graphical effects in learning logic: reasoning, representation and individual differences
%AU Richard Cox
%AU Keith Stenning
%AU Jon Oberlander
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 237-242
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Hyperproof is a computer program created by Barwise and Etchemendy
    for teaching logic using multimodal graphical and sentential
    methods, inspired by their theories of heterogeneous reasoning
    (Barwise and Etchemendy 1994).  Elsewhere, we have proposed a theory
    of the cognitive impact of assigning information to different
    modalities (Stenning and Oberlander 1992).  Our view is that where
    diagrams are advantageous, it is because they enforce the
    representation of information, leading to *weak* expressiveness,
    thereby facilitating inference.  The present study tests and
    develops these claims by comparing the effects of teaching
    undergraduate logic classes using Hyperproof and a control syntactic
    teaching method.  Results indicate that there is significant
    transfer from the logic courses to logical and analytical reasoning
    problems. There are also significant interactions between
    theoretically motivated pre-course aptitude measures and teaching
    method; the interactions influence post-course reasoning performance
    in transfer domains.  Hyperproof boosts students previously weak on
    items which benefit from diagram use, whereas the syntactic course
    appears to degrade the same group of students' graphical strategies.
    As well as being theoretically interesting, these results provide
    support for the important practical conclusion that individual
    differences in aptitude should be taken into account in choosing
    teaching technique.

%TI Failure-Driven Learning as Input Bias
%AU Michael T. Cox
%AU Ashwin Ram
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 231-236
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB Self-selection of input examples on the basis of performance failure
    is a powerful bias for learning systems. The definition of what
    constitutes a learning bias, however, has been typically restricted
    to bias provided by the input language, hypothesis language, and
    preference criteria between competing concept hypotheses. But if
    bias is taken in the broader context as any basis that provides a
    preference for one concept change over another, then the paradigm of
    failure-driven processing indeed provides a bias. Bias is exhibited
    by the selection of examples from an input stream that are examples
    of failure; successful performance is filtered out. We show that the
    degrees of freedom are less in failure-driven learning than in
    success-driven learning and that learning is facilitated because of
    this constraint. We also broaden the definition of failure, provide
    a novel taxonomy of failure causes, and illustrate the interaction
    of both in a multistrategy learning system called Meta-AQUA.

%TI Machines that Forget: Learning from retrieval failure of mis-indexed explanations
%AU Michael T. Cox
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 225-230
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB A reasoner may fail at a cognitive task, not because it does not
    have appropriate knowledge with which to reason, but instead because
    it does not have the proper index or cue with which to retrieve such
    knowledge from memory. The reasoner knows this memory item; it
    simply cannot remember the item. This paper argues that forgetting
    provides an opportunity for learning through memory reorganization.
    A reasoner that takes full advantage of such opportunities, however,
    must be able to reason about its own memory system. To do so, it
    must possess a language for declaratively representing its reasoning
    failures and must reflectively inspect such representations if it is
    to fully explain the reason for its failure. Once such an error is
    understood as a memory failure, the problem of forgetting is to
    re-adjust the indexes so that the knowledge is properly retrieved in
    similar, future situations.

%TI The Null List Strength Effect in Recognition Memory: Environmental Statistics and Connectionist Accounts
%AU Simon Dennis
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 243-247
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB In recognition paradigms, increasing the number of occurrences or
    presentation time in a study list of some words improves performance
    on these words (the item strength effect), but does not affect the
    performance on other words (null list strength effect). In contrast,
    adding new items results in a deterioration of performance on the
    other words (list length effect). Taken together these results place
    strong constraints on models of recognition memory.  To explain
    these data an account based on optimisation to the environment is
    presented. A summary is given of environmental analyses which
    suggest that (1) the likelihood of recurrence of a word within a
    context increases as the number of occurrences increases; (2) the
    repetition rates of other words in a context has no significant
    effect on the recurrence probability of a word; and (3) the
    recurrence probability of a word drops as a function of the number
    of words since the last occurrence of that word. A training set
    which reflected these constraints was constructed and presented to
    an optimising connectionist network which was designed to extract
    recurrence statistics (the Hebbian Recurrent Network). The resultant
    model is able to model all three of the effects outlined above.

%TI Effects of Collaborative Interaction and Computer Tool Use
%AU Sharon Derry
%AU Keith Tookey
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 248-253
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB We compared cognitive processing of two complex arithmetic word
    problems by college students randomly assigned to four different
    situating tool and social contexts: individualized problem solving
    with pen and paper; pair problem solving with pen and paper;
    individualized problem solving on TAPS, a computer-based problem
    solving tool; and collaborative problem solving on TAPS.  TAPS users
    differed from users of conventional tools in that they required
    relatively more time for problem solving, spent more time in
    planning activity, and proportionately less time reading.  With
    respect to the influences of social (versus individual) problem
    solving, collaboration also produced significantly more planning
    behavior, such that the combined use of TAPS and collaboration
    produced a marked increase in planning.  Also, significantly more
    behavior associated with metacognitive monitoring occurred in the
    protocols for pairs.  There was no evidence that use of the TAPS
    tool changed the social nature of the collaboration. However, a
    qualitative analysis yielded interesting information regarding
    negotiation processes underlying pair problem solving.  For example,
    we saw specifically some reasons why untrained pair problem solving
    does not proceed naturally and smoothly.  Results are interpreted in
    terms of situated cognition theory, although symbolic processing
    theories also can explain much of the data.

%TI Learning from Instruction: A Comprehension-Based Approach
%AU Stephanie M. Doane
%AU Young Woo Sohn
%AU David Adams
%AU Danielle S. McNamara
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 254-259
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB A comprehension-based approach to learning assumes that incoming
    information and background knowledge are integrated to form a mental
    represention which is subsequently used to incorporate new
    knowledge.  We demonstrate that this approach can indicate when
    people will learn from instructions.  Specifically, we show that a
    computational model based on the construction-integration theory of
    comprehension (Kintsch, 1988) can explain and predict how individual
    users will comprehend help prompts that guide their generation of
    successful complex commands within an operating system. In previous
    empirical studies, we asked users whose UNIX operating system
    experience varied to produce complex UNIX commands, and then
    provided prompts when the commands they produced were erroneous. The
    prompts were designed to assist subjects with both knowledge and
    processes that our previous efforts have suggested are lacking in
    less expert users. The empirical results showed significant
    differences in response to different prompts as a function of
    background knowledge about UNIX.  In the present work, we extended
    our computational model to include comprehension-based learning
    mechanisms.  We modeled a subset of the individuals in the prompting
    study by representing each subject's initial knowledge base, then
    simulating each user's run through the prompting experiment. The
    results show that the modeled performance matches individual
    performance quite well both quantitatively and qualitatively. This
    work has implications for the development of instructional systems,
    and theoretical implications for the construction-integration theory
    of comprehension.

%TI An Experiment to Determine Improvements in Automated Problem Solving in a Complex Problem Domain
%AU M. Van Dyne
%AU C. Tsatsoulis
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 899-904
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB A previously constructed prototype expert system was extended to
    include case-based reasoning/learning, in order to determine if the
    automated problem solving behavior could be improved. The initial
    expert system was developed by using an inductive machine learning
    technique on 9,445 data records of pregnant women, providing
    production rules to predict preterm delivery. Its predictive
    accuracy was tested on a separate set of 9,445 data records. Next,
    the capability to reason from both production rules and input test
    cases was added to the system, in addition to the capability to
    internally modify its confidence in each piece of knowledge (rule or
    case) and the relative importance of patient attributes which appear
    to be predictive of preterm delivery. The system was structured such
    that the accuracy of either type of reasoning could be measured
    individually to determine how rule-based and case-based reasoning
    perform alone, and to determine how they perform together.  Results
    show that the predictive accuracy of the system was improved, with
    different trends emerging, dependent on the bias of the learning
    data. Neither system performed as well alone as did both together.

%TI Managing Disagreement in Intellectual Conversations: Coordinating Interpersonal and Conceptual Concerns in the Collaborative Construction of Mathematical Explanations
%AU Randi A. Engle
%AU James G. Greeno
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 266-271
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB This paper reports research into how mathematical explanations are
    constructed during conversation based on videotapes of pairs of
    student math teachers collaboratively writing explanations in
    geometry.  In particular, we analyzed how disagreements about parts
    of their explanations were managed in these conversations.  In
    contrast to research on disagreement in everyday conversation,
    explanation disagreements were more likely to overlap with preceding
    turns and to be stated baldly without prefaces, token agreements or
    qualifications.  However, the observed frequencies of different
    kinds of disagreements were not consistent with a model favoring
    explicit substantive disgreement either.  Instead, it is proposed
    that both the interpersonal concerns that would motivate a
    preference for agreement and the conceptual concerns for a quality
    explanation that would motivate a preference for substantive
    disagreement are being managed by participants.  Disagreements are
    co-constructed, and conversants are seen to jointly employ complex
    devices for introducing and managing disagreement across turns that
    can satisfy both kinds of concerns with much less conflict between
    them than might have been expected.

%TI Natural Oculomotor Performance in Looking and Tapping Tasks 
%AU Julie Epelboim
%AU Eileen Kowler 
%AU Mark Edwards
%AU Han Collewijn
%AU Casper J. Erkelens
%AU Zygmunt Pizlo 
%AU Robert M. Steinman
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 272-277
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB A unique apparatus recorded eye and head movements of subjects as 
    they tapped or only looked at sequences of 2, 4 or 6 nearby, 3-D 
    targets.  Each sequence was repeated 10 times to allow an 
    opportunity for learning.  A stereotypical pattern of movements 
    was established after 2-3 repetitions.  Subjects almost always 
    looked at each target just before tapping it. Looking-only was more 
    difficult than tapping in that it took more time and, unlike 
    tapping, usually did not benefit from practice. The number of 
    targets in a sequence affected time/target in both tasks.  Sequence 
    length and practice effects show that memory was involved.  The 
    persistent strategy of looking before tapping  and the subjects' 
    inability to tap a well-learned pattern with eyes closed, show that 
    visual cues were also important. We conclude that motor planning
    occurred first at the level of the task and then at the level of
    specific motor programs.  The relative difficulty of the less
    natural, looking-only task, in which the eyes worked without a 
    meaningful cognitive or motor purpose, suggests that efficient eye 
    movement programming requires a natural task of the kind eye 
    movements evolved to serve.

%TI The Effect of Similarity on Memory for Prior Problems 
%AU Jeremiah M. Faries 
%AU Karen R. Schlossberg 
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 278-282
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Students often rely on prior work or previously studied examples to
    help them solve their current problems.  In this paper we
    investigate the relative contributions of easily accessed
    superficial similarity and deep, solution relevant, structural
    similarity to memory for prior problems. Some models of memory for
    analogy suggest that superficial similarity initially selects or
    constrains memory for prior examples and predicts that analogs that
    share both surface and structural similarities will be more likely
    noticed by novices.  An experiment is reported in which subjects are
    observed as they learn how to program.  We find that people remember
    the examples that are related in terms of structural features alone
    as frequently as those that are related in terms of both structural
    and superficial features but there is no advantage to having
    superficial similarities as well.  Moreover, even though superficial
    features sometimes are associated with helpful similarities and
    sometimes associated with unhelpful similarities people still do not
    get misled by superficial similarity when that is the only basis for
    similarity.  This finding suggests that models that require
    superficial similarity as a major selection procedure for analogical
    reminding may need to be modified for conditions in which people are
    learning a new skill.

%TI MAGI: Analogy-based Encoding Using Regularity and Symmetry
%AU Ronald W. Ferguson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 283-288
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB Analogy has always been considered a mechanism for interrelating distinct
    parts of the world, but it is perhaps just as important to consider how
    analogy might be used to break the world into comprehensible parts.  The
    MAGI program uses the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) to flexibly and
    reliably match a description against itself.  The resulting mapping pulls
    out the two maximally consistent parts of the given description.  MAGI
    then divides out the parts of the mapping and categorizes the mapping as
    symmetrical or regular.  These parts may then be used as the basis for
    new comparisons.  We theorize that MAGI models how people use symmetry
    and regularity to facilitate the encoding task.  We demonstrate this with
    three sets of examples.  First, we show how MAGI can augment traditional
    axis detection and reference frame adjustment in geometric figures.
    Next, we demonstrate how MAGI detects visual and functional symmetry in
    logic circuits, where symmetry of form aids encoding symmetry of
    function.  Finally, to emphasize that regularity and symmetry detection
    is not simply visual, we show how MAGI models some aspects of expectation
    generation in story understanding.  In general, MAGI shows symmetry and
    regularity to be not only pretty, but also cognitively valuable.

%TI Context Effects in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: The Location of Prepositional Phrase Attachment
%AU Evelyn Ferstl
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 295-300
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB Two experiments are reported to test whether the location of
    prepositional phrase attachment can be influenced by syntactic and
    contextual factors. The first experiment tested the hypothesis that
    attachment is delayed until the word after the prepositional phrase.
    Replicating the results of Taraban and McClelland (1988), this
    experiment showed that sentence bias rather than syntactic structure
    determines the ease of processing; attachment effects were observed
    on the words after the noun filler. In addition, using sentences in
    which the noun filler consisted of a compound noun, we also found
    evidence for delayed attachment. Using sentences in which the noun
    filler was modified by an adjective, we found evidence for early
    attachment. In the second experiment, we used context paragraphs to
    induce earlier attachment for the compound noun sentences. When the
    first noun of the compound was mentioned in the prior discourse,
    attachment effects were observed on the disambiguating noun filler.
    When the first noun was not mentioned, attachment effects were
    observed, as in Experiment 1, on the words after the prepositional
    phrase. Thus, the study supports the idea of a context-dependent
    delay strategy for prepositional phrase attachment.

%TI The Construction-Integration Model: A Framework for Studying Context Effects in Sentence Processing
%AU Evelyn Ferstl
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 289-294
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Contextual and pragmatic knowledge facilitates the eventual
    interpretation of a syntactically ambiguous sentence.  However,
    psycholinguistic studies have not provided a clear answer to when
    and how this non-syntactic knowledge is used.  One explanation for
    the discrepancy of the results is that the predictions for parsing
    processes in context cannot be specified unless they are based on a
    theory of text comprehension.  The construction-integration model of
    discourse comprehension (Kintsch, 1988) is proposed as an example
    for such a theory.  The model is parallel and weakly interactive,
    and its psychological validity has been shown in a variety of
    applications.  Three simulations for syntactic ambiguity resolutions
    are presented.  In the first, syntactic constraints are used to
    account for the correct interpretation of a garden-path sentence, as
    well as for common misparses.  In the second example, pragmatic
    knowledge is used to disambiguate a prepositional phrase attachment.
    In the final example, it is shown that the model can also account
    for effects of discourse context in the resolution of prepositional
    phrase attachment ambiguities.

%TI Attention Allocation During Movement Preparation
%AU Martin H. Fischer
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 307-312
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB Identification performance was measured for letters which were
    briefly presented at different spatial locations and time delays
    relative to the beginning of manual movement preparation.
    Identification performance depended on the complexity of the
    upcoming movement and decreased prior to movement onset.  Further
    findings of similar identification performance with differerent
    spatial relations between probe location and manual movement
    direction cast doubt on the generality of a premotor theory of
    attention.

%TI Incremental Structure Mapping
%AU Kenneth D. Forbus
%AU Ronald W. Ferguson
%AU Dedre Gentner
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 313-318
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Many cognitive tasks involving analogy, such as understanding
    metaphors, problem-solving, and learning, require the ability to
    extend mappings as new information is found.  This paper describes a
    new version of SME, called I-SME, that operates incrementally.
    I-SME is inspired by Keane's IAM model and the use of incremental
    mapping in Falkenhainer's PHINEAS learning system.  We describe the
    I-SME algorithm and discuss tradeoffs introduced by incremental
    mapping, including parallel versus serial processing and pragmatic
    influences.  The utility of I-SME is illustrated by two examples.
    First, we show that I-SME can account for the psychological results
    found by Keane on a serial version of the Holyoak & Thagard
    attribute mapping task.  Second, we describe how I-SME is used in
    the Minimal Analogical Reasoning System (MARS), which uses analogy
    to solve engineering thermodynamics problems.

%TI Learning the Arabic Plural: The Case for Minority Default Mappings in Connectionist Networks.
%AU Neil Forrester
%AU Kim Plunkett
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 319-323
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Connectionist accounts of inflectional morphology have focussed on
    the domain of the English Past Tense (e.g.  Rumelhart & McClelland
    1986; Plunkett & Marchman 1993). In this inflectional domain, the
    default mapping process (add /ed/) reflects the process of
    suffixation adopted by the majority of the forms in the language.
    Connectionist models exploit the imbalance between English regular
    and irregular verbs when learning the past tense and when responding
    to novel forms in a default fashion. Not all inflectional systems
    have a default mapping which is characterized by a majority of forms
    in the language. The Arabic Plural System has been cited (Marcus et
    al. 1993) as one such system where a minority default mapping
    process operates. The Sound Plural in Arabic applies to only a
    minority of forms in the lexicon (~10%), yet it appears to adopt the
    role of a default mapping for novel nouns. We describe a
    connectionist model that can learn a minority default mapping
    analogous to the Arabic plural and discuss its performance in
    relation to type and token frequency effects, and their distribution
    within phonetic space.

%TI Using Introspective Reasoning to Guide Index Refinement in Case-Based Reasoning
%AU Susan Fox 
%AU David Leake
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 324-329
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB Case-based reasoning research on indexing and retrieval focuses
    primarily on developing specific retrieval criteria, rather than on
    developing mechanisms by which such criteria can be learned as
    needed. This paper presents a framework for learning to refine
    indexing criteria by introspective reasoning.  In our approach, a
    self-model of desired system performance is used to determine when
    and how to refine retrieval criteria.  We describe the advantages of
    this approach for focusing learning on useful information even in
    the absence of explicit processing failures, and support its
    benefits with experimental results on how an implementation of the
    model affects performance of a case-based planning system.

%TI How do representations of visual form organize our percepts of visual motion?
%AU Gregory Francis
%AU Stephen Grossberg
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 330-334
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB How does the visual system generate percepts of moving forms? How
    does this happen when the forms are emergent percepts (such as
    illusory contours or segregated textures) and the motion percept is
    apparent motion between the emergent forms?  A neural model of
    form-motion interactions is developed to explain parametric
    properties of psychophysical motion data and to make predictions
    about the parallel cortical processing streams V1 --> MT and V1 -->
    V2 --> MT. The model simulates many parametric psychophysical data
    arising from form-motion interactions. A key linkage between form
    and motion data is articulated in terms of properties of visual
    persistence and properties of apparent motion. The model explains
    how an illusory contour can move in apparent motion to another
    illusory contour or to a luminance-derived contour; how illusory
    contour persistence relates to the upper ISI threshold for apparent
    motion; and how upper and lower ISI thresholds for seeing apparent
    motion between two flashes decrease with stimulus duration and
    narrow with spatial separation (Korte's laws).  Psychophysical data
    are derived from an analysis of how orientationally tuned form
    perception mechanisms and directionally tuned motion perception
    mechanisms interact to generate consistent percepts of moving forms.

%TI Dynamically constraining connectionist networks to produce distributed, orthogonal representations to reduce catastrophic forgetting  
%AU Robert M. French
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 335-340
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB It is well known that when a connectionist network is trained on one
    set of patterns and then attempts to add new patterns to its
    repertoire, catastrophic interference may result.  The use of
    sparse, orthogonal hidden-layer representations has been shown to
    reduce catastrophic interference.  The author demonstrates that the
    use of sparse representations may, in certain cases, actually result
    in worse performance on catastrophic interference.  This paper
    argues for the necessity of maintaining hidden-layer representations
    that are both as highly distributed and as highly orthogonal as
    possible.  The author presents a learning algorithm, called
    context-biasing, that dynamically solves the problem of constraining
    hidden-layer representations to simultaneously produce good
    orthogonality and distributedness.  On the data tested for this
    study, context-biasing is shown to reduce catastrophic interference
    by more than 50% compared to standard backpropagation.

%TI Inference Processes in Speech Perception
%AU Gareth Gaskell
%AU William Marslen-Wilson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 341-345
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB Cross-modal priming experiments have shown that surface variations
    in speech are perceptually tolerated as long as they occur in
    phonologically viable contexts. For example, [klim] (cleam) gains
    access to the mental representation of clean when in the context of
    [klimpaks] (cleam parks), since the change is a natural one,
    reflecting the phonological process of place assimilation.  This
    implies that speech perception involves processes of phonological
    inference, which recover the underlying form of speech.  Here we
    investigate the locus of these inference processes, using the
    phoneme monitoring task.  A set of stimulus sentences were created
    containing deviations that were either phonologically viable (as in
    cleam parks above) or unviable.  In Experiment 1, subjects monitored
    for the segment underlying the surface change (in the above example,
    /n/) and in Experiment 2 the following segment (/p/) was the target.
    In addition, the lexical status of the carrier word was manipulated
    (e.g., clean vs threan), contrasting lexical and non- lexical
    theories of phonological inference.  Both experiments showed strong
    effects of phonological viability for real words, with weaker
    effects for the non-word stimuli.  These results suggest that
    phonological inference can occur non-lexically, but that it
    interacts strongly with the process of lexical access.

%TI How Graphs Mediate Analog and Symbolic Representation
%AU Merideth Gattis
%AU Keith Holyoak
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 346-350
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB Three experiments are reported that examine the impact of people's
    goals and conceptual understanding on graph interpretation, in order
    to determine how people use graphical representations to evaluate
    functional dependencies between continuous variables.  Subjects made
    inferences about the relative rate of two continuous linear
    variables (altitude and temperature).  We varied the assignments of
    variables to axes, the perceived cause-effect relation between the
    variables, and the causal status of the variable being queried.  The
    most striking finding was that accuracy was greater when the
    Slope-Mapping Constraint was honored, which requires that the
    variable being queried -- usually the effect or dependent variable,
    but potentially the cause instead -- is assigned to the vertical
    axis, so that steeper lines map to faster changes in the queried
    variable.  This constraint dominates when it conflicts with others,
    such as preserving the low-level mapping of altitude onto the
    vertical axis.  Our findings emphasize the basic conclusion that
    graphs are not pictures, but rather symbolic systems for
    representing higher-order relations.  We propose that graphs provide
    external instantiations of intermediate mental representations,
    which enable people to move from pictorial representations to
    abstractions through the use of natural mappings between perceptual
    properties and conceptual relations.

%TI Classicalism and Cognitive Architecture 
%AU Tim van Gelder
%AU Lars Niklasson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 905-909
%SC Sunday, August 14, 4-5:30
%AB This paper challenges the widely accepted claim that "classical"
    cognitive architectures can explain the systematicity of cognition
    (Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988) . There are plausible ways of rendering
    more precise the systematicity hypothesis (as standardly formulated)
    in which it is entailed by classical architectures, and other
    plausible ways in which it is not.  Therefore, it is not a
    determinate issue whether systematicity is entailed, and hence
    explained, by classical architectures. The general argument is
    illustrated in a particular domain, the systematicity of deductive
    inference. In the case of the capacity to carry out the inference
    modus tollens, the systematicity hypothesis can be made precise in
    two ways, one entailed by classical architectures, another which is
    not. Further, the latter, but not the former, accurately describes
    the actual empirical phenomenon. Put another way, the clumps that
    these deductive inference capacities come in are not the clumps that
    are entailed by classical architectures.  Therefore, in this area at
    least, systematicity considerations count against the classical
    conception of cognitive architecture.

%TI The Coherence Imbalance Hypothesis: A Functional Approach to Asymmetry in Comparison
%AU Dedre Gentner
%AU Brian F. Bowdle
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 351-356
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Directional asymmetry is a well-documented phenomenon in research on
    similarity, metaphor, and analogy.  In this paper, we present an
    account of this phenomenon based on structural alignment.  We
    propose that a major source of asymmetry is coherence imbalance:
    that is, a difference in the degree of systematicity of the
    relational structures being compared.  These claims are tested in
    three experiments which examine the relationship between asymmetry,
    informativity, and conceptual coherence.  The results support the
    hypothesis that coherence imbalance is a key factor in directional
    comparison processes.  Further, by incorporating the insights
    offered by structural alignment, coherence imbalance advances a more
    functional account of asymmetry.

%TI A Corpus Analysis of Recency Preference and Predicate Proximity
%AU Edward Gibson
%AU Jacob Loomis
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 357-362
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB The recent availability of large on-line parsed corpora makes it possible
    to test theories of psycholinguistic complexity by comparing the
    frequency distributions of closely related constructions.  In this paper,
    we use this technique to test the psycholinguistic theory proposed by
    Gibson et al.  (1993), which includes two independently motivated
    attachment principles: Recency Preference and Predicate Proximity.  In
    order to test this theory, we examined two general classes of attachment
    ambiguities from the parsed Wall Street Journal corpus from the Penn
    Treebank: 1) ambiguities which involve three prospective noun phrase
    attachment sites; and 2) ambiguities which involve three prospective verb
    phrase attachment sites.  Given three prospective noun phrase (NP) sites
    in English, the theory most naturally predicts a complexity ordering of
    NP3 (easiest, most recent), NP1, NP2, but a ranking of VP3, VP2, VP1 for
    verb phrase attachments.  Our corpus analyses support both of these
    predictions.

%TI Using Trajectory Mapping to Analyze Musical Intervals
%AU Stephen A. Gilbert
%AU Whitman Richards
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 363-368
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB Cognitive scientists have often pondered the question of perceptual
    spaces, that is, the question of how a certain gamut of familiar
    stimuli might be organized in the mind.  We present Trajectory
    Mapping as an alternative clustering method to the traditional
    algorithm of Multi-Dimensional Scaling.  We suggest that given data
    about the relationships among stimuli, Multi-Dimensional Scaling
    provides one type of information (geometric), while Trajectory
    Mapping offers a second type (relational).  As an illustration we
    present the initial results of applying both clustering techniques
    to subjects' perceptions of musical intervals.  While an
    interpretation of the Multi-Dimensional Scaling requires a priori
    knowledge of music theory, Trajectory Mapping directly reveals the
    music theory that has been internalized by subjects.

%TI Are Children Lazy Learners? A comparison of natural and machine learning of stress
%AU Steven Gillis
%AU Walter Daelemans
%AU Gert Durieux
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 369-374
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB Do children acquire rules for main stress assignment or do they
    learn stress in an exemplar-based way? In the language acquisition
    literature, the former approach has been advocated without
    exception: although they hear most words produced with their
    appropriate stress pattern, children are taken to extract rules, and
    do not store stress patterns lexically. The evidence for a
    rule-based approach is investigated, and it will be argued that in
    the literature such an approach is preferred due to an
    oversimplification of exemplar-based models. We will report
    experiments showing that Instance-Based Learning, an exemplar-based
    model, makes the same kinds of stress related errors in production
    that children make: (i) the amount of production errors is related
    to metrical markedness, and (ii) stress shifts and errors with
    respect to the segmental and syllabic structure of words, typically
    take the form of a regularization of stress patterns. Instance-Basd
    Learning belongs to a class of Lazy Learning algorithms. In these
    algorithms, no explicit abstractions in the form of decision trees
    or rules are derived; abstraction is driven by similarity during
    performance. Our results indicate that at least for this domain,
    this kind of lazy learning is a valid alternative to rule-based
    learning. Moreover, the results plead for a reanalysis of language
    acquisition data in terms of exemplar-based models.

%TI Array Representations for Model-Based Spatial Reasoning
%AU Janice Glasgow
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 375-380
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB To date, the major focus of research in knowledge representations
    for artificial intelligence has been on sentential or linguistic
    formalisms involving logic and rule-based reasoning.  There is a
    growing body of evidence suggesting, however, that much of human
    problem solving is achieved, not through the application of rules of
    inference, but rather through the manipulation of mental models.
    Such a model is represented by a system with a similar relational
    structure to the reality it represents.  Moreover, spatial reasoning
    with models involves the inspection and transformation of
    representations in ways that are analogous to visually inspecting
    and physically transforming entities in the world.  Since a crucial
    component of knowledge acquisition is to capture an expert's mental
    state and reasoning strategies, it is important to shift some of the
    attention of AI research to the study of representation techniques
    that correspond to the mental models used by humans.  The paper
    begins with a cognitive perspective on model-based reasoning.  A
    knowledge representation scheme for spatial reasoning with models is
    then presented. In this scheme, which has evolved from research in
    computational imagery, spatial models are represented as symbolic
    arrays where dimensions of the array correspond to transitive order
    relations among entities.

%TI Binding of Object Representations by Synchronous Cortical Dynamics Explains Temporal Order and Spatial Pooling Data
%AU Alexander Grunewald
%AU Stephen Grossberg
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 387-391
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB A key problem in cognitive science concerns how the brain binds
    together parts of an object into a coherent visual object
    representation. One difficulty that this binding process needs to
    overcome is that different parts of an object may be processed by
    the brain at different rates and may thus become desynchronized.
    Perceptual framing is a mechanism that resynchronizes cortical
    activities corresponding to the same retinal object. A neural
    network model based on cooperation between oscillators via feedback
    from a subsequent processing stage is presented that is able to
    rapidly resynchronize desynchronized featural activities.  Model
    properties help to explain perceptual framing data, including
    psychophysical data about temporal order judgments.  These
    cooperative model interactions also simulate data concerning the
    reduction of threshold contrast as a function of stimulus length.
    The model hereby provides a unified explanation of temporal order
    and threshold contrast data as manifestations of a cortical binding
    process that can rapidly resynchronize image parts which belong
    together in visual object representations.

%TI Using Connectionist Networks to Examine the Role of Prior Constraints in Human Learning
%AU Michael Harm
%AU Lori Altmann
%AU Mark S. Seidenberg
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 392-396
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB This research investigated the effects of prior knowledge on
    learning in psychologically-plausible connectionist networks.  This
    issue was examined with respect to the benchmark
    orthography-to-phonology mapping task (Sejnowski & Rosenberg, 1986;
    Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989).  Learning about the correspondences
    between orthography and phonology is a critical step in learning to
    read. Children (unlike the networks mentioned above) bring to this
    task extensive knowledge about the sound-structure of their
    language.  We first describe a simple neural network that acquired
    some of this phonological knowledge. We then summarize simulations
    showing that having this knowledge in place facilitates the
    acquisition of orthographic-phonological correspondences, producing
    a higher level of asymptotic performance with fewer implausible
    errors and better nonword generalization.  The results suggest that
    connectionist networks may provide closer approximations to human
    performance if they!  incorporate more realistic assump tions about
    relevant sorts of background knowledge.

%TI Objects, actions, nouns, and verbs
%AU Peter M. Hastings
%AU Steven L. Lytinen
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 397-402
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB This paper describes a lexical acquisition mechanism that was
    implemented in order to increase the robustness of a Natural
    Language Processing system.  Although the mechanism was not intended
    to be a cognitive model of children's language acquisition, it
    demonstrates many similarities with psycholinguistic findings.  In
    particular, the structure of the domain knowledge representation
    forces the system to take a bipolar approach to learning nouns and
    verbs.  Psycholinguistic studies demonstrate differing treatment of
    nouns and verbs by children and suggest a structural basis for this
    difference.  The knowledge-level similarities between our system and
    human linguistic knowledge make it possible to infer that children
    must adopt a similar strategy to effectively learn word meanings.

%TI Psychological Evidence for Assumptions of Path-Based Inheritance Reasoning 
%AU Claire Hewson
%AU Carl Vogel
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 409-414
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB The psychological validity of inheritance reasoners is clarified.
    Elio and Pelletier (1993) presented the first pilot experiment
    exploring some of these issues.  We investigate other foundational
    assumptions of inheritance reasoning with defaults: transitivity,
    blocking of transitivity by negative defaults, preemption in terms
    of structurally defined specificity and structurally defined
    redundancy of information.  Responses were in accord with the
    assumption of at least limited transitivity, however, reasoning with
    negative information and structurally defined specificity conditions
    did not support the predictions of the literature.  `Preemptive'
    links were found to provide additional information leading to
    indeterminacy, rather than providing completely overriding
    information as the literature predicts.  On the other hand, results
    support the structural identification of certain links as redundant.
    Other findings suggest that inheritance proof-theory might be
    excessively guided by its syntax.

%TI Empirical Evidence Regarding the Folk Psychological Concept of Belief
%AU Claire Hewson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 403-408
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB This paper presents empirical evidence regarding the nature of our
    commonsense concept of belief. The findings have significant bearing
    upon claims made by authors concerned with the Folk Psychology
    Debate---in particular, they challenge Stephen Stich's (1983) claim
    that folk psychology is committed to a *broad* account of belief
    states.  In contrast it is found that folk psychology favours a
    *narrow* account of belief. This result is important in refuting
    Stich's claim that the folk psychological concept of belief has no
    role to play in a developed cognitive science. The paper also
    presents evidence regarding the influence of several factors on folk
    psychological judgements of belief individuation (emphasised
    similarities/differences between the referents of beliefs, nature of
    past beliefs, goal of classification), and introduces a methodology
    by which to investigate further factors.  It is argued that the
    observed conflict between individual speculations about likely folk
    psychological intuitions within the philosophical literature and
    actual empirical data regarding subjects' responses highlights the
    important contribution of experimental psychology in exploring such
    philosophical issues.

%TI Abstraction of Sensory-Motor Features
%AU Kazuo Hiraki
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 415-420
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB This paper presents a way that enables robots to learn abstract
    concepts from sensory/perceptual data. In order to overcome the gap
    between the low-level sensory data and higher-level concept
    description, a method called "feature abstraction" is used.  Feature
    abstraction dynamically defines abstract sensors from primitive
    sensory devices and makes it possible to learn appropriate
    sensory-motor constraints. This method has been implemented on a
    real mobile robot as a learning system called ACORN2. ACORN2 was
    evaluated with some empirical results and shown that the system can
    learn some abstract concepts more accurately than other existing
    systems.

%TI WanderECHO: A Connectionist Simulation of Limited Coherence
%AU Christopher M. Hoadley
%AU Michael Ranney
%AU Patricia Schank
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 421-426
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB The Theory of Explanatory Coherence, or TEC, (Ranney & Thagard,
    1988; Thagard, 1989, 1992) and ECHO, a connectionist implementation
    of TEC, attempt to model human reasoning about evidence and
    hypotheses. The ECHO model is based on the simultaneous satisfaction
    of multiple constraints.  This yields predicted activations
    ("believabilities") for propositions, which are based on the
    propositions' evidential status, their explanatory relationships,
    and their contradictory relationships.  While ECHO has been
    demonstrated to usefully model human reasoning, it does not model
    processing limitations on the maintenance of coherence.  WanderECHO
    is a variation on the ECHO model that attempts to simulate
    attentional and memorial limitations with a stochastic updating
    algorithm that is based on a traveling focus of attention. Several
    variants of the WanderECHO simulation were applied to Schank and
    Ranney's (1991) data, and were found to generally simulate subjects'
    mean believability ratings better than standard ECHO.

%TI PROVERB - A System Explaining Machine-Found Proofs
%AU Xiaorong Huang
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 427-432
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB This paper outlines an implemented system called PROVERB that
    explains machine-found natural deduction proofs in natural language.
    Different from earlier works, we pursue a reconstructive approach.
    Based on the observation that natural deduction proofs are at a too
    low level of abstraction compared with proofs found in mathematical
    textbooks, we define first the concept of so-called assertion level
    inference rules.  Derivations justified by these rules can
    intuitively be understood as the application of a definition or a
    theorem. Then an algorithm is introduced that abstracts
    machine-found ND proofs using the assertion level inference rules.
    Abstracted proofs are then verbalized into natural language by a
    presentation module. The most significant feature of the
    presentation module is that it combines standard hierarchical text
    planning and techniques that locally organize argumentative texts
    based on the derivation relation under the guidance of a focus
    mechanism. The behavior of the system is demonstrated with the help
    of a concrete example throughout the paper.

%TI Mapping Hierarchical Structures with Synchrony for Binding: Preliminary Investigations 
%AU John E. Hummel   
%AU Eric R. Melz   
%AU Jeff Thompson  
%AU Keith J. Holyoak
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 433-438
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB Synchrony of firing has recently become a popular technique for
    dynamic binding in neural networks, and has been applied to numerous
    problem domains.  However, hierarchical structures are difficult to
    represent using synchrony for binding.  This paper presents our
    progress toward a framework for representing hierarchies in a neural
    network using synchrony for dynamic binding.  We illustrate the
    approach with a model of analogical mapping.  The model (IMM2) uses
    synchrony to bind case roles to objects within propositions.
    Hierarchies are established by allowing units representing
    propositions to play a dual role, acting both as the argument of one
    proposition and as a pointer to another.

%TI Lexical Disambiguation Based on Distributed Representations of Context Frequency
%AU Marshall R. Mayberry, III
%AU Risto Miikkulainen
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 601-606
%SC Monday, August 15, 11-12:30
%AB A model for lexical disambiguation is presented that is based on
    combining the frequencies of past contexts of ambiguous words.  The
    frequencies are encoded in the word representations and define the words'
    semantics. A Simple Recurrent Network (SRN) parser combines the context
    frequencies one word at a time, always producing the most likely
    interpretation of the current sentence at its output. This disambiguation
    process is most striking when the interpretation involves semantic
    flipping, that is, an alternation between two opposing meanings as more
    words are read in. The sense of "throwing a ball" alternates between
    "dance" and "baseball" as indicators such as the agent, location, and
    recipient are input. The SRN parser demonstrates how the context
    frequencies are dynamically combined to determine the interpretation of
    such sentences. We hypothesize that several other aspects of ambiguity
    resolution are based on similar mechanisms, and can be naturally
    approached from the distributed connectionist viewpoint.

%TI The Curtate Cycloid Illusion:  Cognitive Constraints on the Processing of Rolling Motion
%AU Matthew I. Isaak
%AU Marcel Adam Just
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 439-444
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB When a wheel rolls along a flat surface, a point on the wheel's
    perimeter follows a cycloid trajectory.  Subjects, however draw the
    curtate cycloid, characterized by bottom loops, rather than the cycloid
    to depict the path that a point on a static wheel's perimeter would
    trace if the wheel were rolling.  This is the curtate cycloid illusion. 
    In Experiment 1, we show that animating the wheel does not dispel the
    illusion and that subjects high in spatial ability are less susceptible
    to the illusion than are low-spatials.  Experiments 2, 3a, and 3b
    supported the hypothesis that the illusion occurs when subjects
    reallocate cognitive resources from processing a rolling wheel's
    translation to computing its instant centers, the point about which the
    wheel is rotating at a given instant in time.   This reallocation occurs
    only when a reference point on the wheel's perimeter contacts and leaves
    the surface.  We conclude that the illusion does not reflect fundamental
    perceptual biases, but rather stems from transient shortages of
    cognitive resources during the higher-level processing of the wheel's
    translation and rotation.

%TI Direct and Indirect Measures of Implicit learning
%AU Luis Jimenez 
%AU Axel Cleeremans
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 445-450
%SC Monday, August 15, 2-3:30
%AB Comparing the relative sensitivity of direct and indirect measures
    of learning is proposed as the best way to provide evidence for
    unconscious learning when both conceptual and operative definitions
    of awareness are lacking. This approach was first proposed by
    Reingold & Merikle (1988) in the context of subliminal perception.
    In this paper, we apply it to a choice reaction task in which the
    material is generated based on a probabilistic finite-state grammar
    (Cleeremans, 1993). We show (1) that subjects progressively learn
    about the statistical structure of the stimulus material over
    training with the choice reaction task, and (2) that they can use
    some of this knowledge to predict the location of the next stimulus
    in a subsequent explicit prediction task. However, detailed partial
    correlational analyses of the correspondence between CRT performance
    and the conditional probabilities of each stimulus showed that large
    effects remained even when controlling for explicit knowlede as
    assessed by the prediction task. Hence we conclude (1) that at least
    some of the knowledge expressed in CRT performance can not be
    characterized as conscious, and (2) that even when associations are
    found at a global level of analysis, dissociations can still be
    obtained when more detailed analyses are conducted. Finally, we also
    show that subjects are limited in the depth of the contingencies
    they can learn about, and that these limitations are shared by the
    Simple Recurrent Network model of Cleeremans & McClelland (1991).

%TI Computational Simulation of Depth Perception in the Mammalian Visual System
%AU Jesse S. Jin
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 451-456
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB This paper presents a computational model for stereopsis. Laplacian
    of Gaussian filters are used to simulate ganglion cells and LGN
    cells and zero-crossings extracted provide spatial features in the
    visual scene.  A set of one-octave Gabor filters is used to extract
    orientation information, which cover 0 to 60 cycles/degree interval
    in the human visual system.  A Gaussian sphere model is used to map
    a 3D space onto two 2D image planes, which combines monocular cues
    with binocular cues in stereo matching. The determinant of the
    Jacobian of the mapping is derived and matching is performed using
    zero-crossings associated with their orientation information. The
    possibility of transferring the knowledge such as the probability of
    occurrence of visual scenes to the matching process from the mapping
    is discussed.  Relaxation labelling is used as a co-operative
    process, which simulates binocular fusion and rivalry in the human
    visual process.

%TI Bottom-up recognition learning: A compilation based model of limited-lookahead learning
%AU Todd R. Johnson
%AU Jiajie Zhang
%AU Hongbin Wang
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 469-474
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB When faced with a novel problem, people can sometimes decide what to
    do by imagining alternative sequences of actions and then taking the
    sequence that solves the problem. In many problems, however, various
    constraints, such as working memory capacity, limit the amount of
    internal lookahead that people can do. This paper describes
    Bottom-Up Recognition Learning (BURL), a model of limited-lookahead
    learning based on final first learning and knowledge compilation. In
    BURL, knowledge compilation of limited-lookahead search over
    successive problem-solving trials transfers knowledge from the leaf
    nodes of a problem space to the top node. Two experiments test
    BURL's predictions. The first compares the Soar implementation of
    BURL to human subjects learning to play two Tic-Tac-Toe isomorphs.
    This experiment shows that BURL can account for learning that occurs
    when subjects can perform a limited lookahead. The second experiment
    studies transfer between two strategy acquisition tasks for one
    isomorph.  This experiment shows that BURL must be used in
    conjunction with other learning methods to fully explain skill
    acquisition on limited-lookahead tasks.

%TI A computational model of human abductive skill and its acquisition
%AU Todd R. Johnson
%AU Josef Krems
%AU Nasir K. Amra
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 463-468
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Abduction is the process of constructing a plausible explanation for
    a set of observations. It is the fundamental type of reasoning in
    many complex tasks such as scientific discovery and diagnosis. This
    paper presents a mental-model theory of human abductive skill and
    its acquisition in which abduction is viewed as the sequential
    comprehension and integration of data into a single situation model.
    Comprehension and integration are accomplished using satisficing
    search of multiple problem spaces. The model has been implemented in
    Soar and has been tested by comparing its predictions to those of
    human subjects. The experimental results show that the model can
    account for several important behavioral regularities, including
    power-law speed-up, how the order of data presentation affects a
    response, deviation of responses from probability theory, and how
    the task and domain characteristics affect a person's response.

%TI Adaptive learning of Gaussian categories leads to decision bounds and response surfaces incompatible with optimal decision making
%AU Michael Kalish
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 479-484
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Two experiments in category learning are used to examine two types
    of categorization models.  In both a two and four choice experiment,
    subjects are shown to fail to learn to optimally classify two
    dimensional stimuli.  The general recognition theory (GRT) of Ashby
    & Maddox (1990) predicts quadratic decision bounds.  The first
    experiment disconfirms this.  The extended GRT predicts that
    learners adopt a bound of complexity equivalent to the optimal one.
    The second experiment disconfirms this as well.  Both experiments
    support the idea that general resources of adaptive systems can
    provide explanations of observed sub-optimal behavior.

%TI Coping with the Complexity of Design: Avoiding Conflicts and Prioritizing Constraints
%AU Irvin R. Katz
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 485-489
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Design is a complex cognitive task that pushes the limits of human
    information processing.  How do expert designers handle this
    complexity?  Professional and student architects solved a real-world
    diagram construction task that required satisfying multiple,
    sometimes conflicting, constraints to achieve an acceptable design.
    Professionals' initial designs were more consistent with task
    constraints and remained more consistent throughout problem
    solution.  Students restructured their designs more often in their
    unsuccessful attempts to satisfy the multiple constraints imposed by
    the task.  Analysis of subjects' verbal and action protocols
    suggests that one aspect of professionals' superior performance is
    their early recogni-tion of the critical constraints on a design.
    Professionals handle these constraints before others to structure
    the remaining, more negotiable, constraints.  By properly ordering
    constraints, professionals effectively minimize constraint
    conflicts.  As conflict resolution has high processing costs,
    constraint prioritization may be one way that professionals cope
    with the complexity of design.

%TI Adaptation as a Selection Constraint on Analogical Mapping
%AU Mark T. Keane
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 490-495
%SC Sunday, August 14, 2-3:30
%AB In any given analogy, there are potentially a large number of
    possible mapping interpretations. One of the key issues in analogy
    research is how one of these mappings comes to be selected as
    optimal and used as the basis for the analogical comparison.  It is
    well-established that structural factors, notably systematicity, can
    act as selection constraints on mapping. The present work tests if
    pragmatic and adaptation factors can also act as selection
    constraints on mapping.  The selection of a mapping based on
    pragmatic factors proposes that people can exploit the higher-order
    schematic structure of a domain to select one mapping over another.
    With respect to adaptation factors, the proposal is that a mapping
    will be selected if it is evaluated as being more adaptable than
    other competing mappings. Both of these predictions are tested in a
    novel, problem solving paradigm.  The main finding is that
    adaptation factors act as a selection constraint but that pragmatic
    factors do not. The implications of these results for computational
    models of analogy are discussed.

%TI Semantics and Pragmatics of Vague Probability Expressions
%AU Bernhard Kipper
%AU Anthony Jameson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 496-501
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Two experiments assessed the membership functions that German speakers
    assign to 12 adverb phrases and 17 modal verb forms that express
    probability assessments. These expressions fall largely into three rather
    homogeneous classes. The membership functions are used as part of the
    semantic knowledge base of the natural language dialog system PRACMA, one
    of whose purposes is to model pragmatic and contextual influences on the
    use of vague expressions.  The system's normative model accounts for the
    role, in the selection and interpretation of vague probability
    expressions, of the listener's prior expectations, the speaker's dialog
    motivation, and the expressions that the speaker could have used but did
    not.

%TI Immediate Effects of Discourse and Semantic Context in Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Eye-Tracking
%AU Michael Spivey-Knowlton
%AU Michael Tanenhaus
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 812-817
%SC Tuesday, August 16, 11-12:30
%AB We monitored readers' eye-movements to examine the time-course of
    discourse and semantic influences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Our results indicate immediate and simultaneous influences of
    referential context and local semantic fit in the reading of reduced
    relative clauses (i.e., The horse raced past the barn fell.).  These
    results support a model of sentence processing in which alternatives
    of a syntactic ambiguity are differentially activated by the
    bottom-up input, and syntactically-relevant contextual constraints
    simultaneously add activation to their supported alternatives.
    Competition between comparably active alternatives may then cause
    slowed reading times in regions of ambiguity.

%TI The Context-Sensitive Cognitive Architecture DUAL
%AU Boicho Kokinov
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 502-507
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB Context-sensitivity is an important characteristic feature of every
    cognitive process and therefore should be reflected in every
    architecture pretending to explain human cognition. In this paper
    some experimental facts demonstrating context effects on various
    cognitive processes are reviewed and an attempt at context modeling
    is described. A hybrid (symbolic/connectionist) cognitive
    architecture, DUAL, is proposed. It consists of a multitude of
    agents having both a symbolic and a connectionist part. The symbolic
    part represents some knowledge structure, while the connectionist
    part represents its relevance to the current context. The
    performance of the cognitive system emerges as result of the work
    and interaction of the currently active agents, where the set of
    active agents is not predefined for a specific task but is dynamic
    and reflects the specific context. So particular symbolic operations
    and data structures may be supported or suppressed depending on the
    particular activation pattern of the connectionist parts which
    represent the context-dependent relevance of the operations and
    structures. In this way a context-sensitive computation emerges. An
    example of context-sensitive deductive reasoning is described.

%TI Learning of rules that have high-frequency exceptions: New empirical data and a hybrid connectionist model
%AU John K. Kruschke
%AU Michael E. Erickson
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 514-519
%SC Sunday, August 14, 11-12:30
%AB Theorists of human learning, in domains as various as category
    learning and language acquisition, have grappled with the issue of
    whether learners induce rules or remember exemplars, or both. In
    this article we present new data that reflect both rule induction
    and exemplar encoding, and we present a new connectionist model that
    specifies one way in which rule-based and exemplar-based mechanisms
    might interact. Our empirical study was motivated by analogy to past
    tense acquisition, and specifically by the previous work of Palermo
    & Howe (1970).  Human subjects learned to categorize items, most of
    which could be classified by a simple rule, except for a few
    frequently recurring exceptions. The modeling was motivated by the
    idea of combining an exemplar-based module (ALCOVE, Kruschke 1992)
    and a rule-based module in a connectionist architecture, and
    allowing the system to learn which module should be responsible for
    which instances, using the competitive gating mechanism introduced
    by Jacobs, Jordan, Hinton & Nowlan (1991).  We report quantitative
    fits of the model to the learning data.

%TI Recurrent Natural Language Parsing
%AU Stan C. Kwasny
%AU Sahnny Johnson
%AU Barry L. Kalman
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 525-530
%SC Monday, August 15, 7:30-9
%AB A recurrent network was trained from sentence examples to construct
    symbolic parses of sentence forms.  Hundreds of sentences,
    representing significant syntactic complexity, were formulated and
    then divided into training and testing sets to evaluate the ability
    of a recurrent network to learn their structure.  The network is
    shown to generalize well over test sentences and the errors that do
    remain are found to be of a single type and related to human
    limitations of sentence processing.

%TI When 'Or' Means 'And': A Study in Mental models
%AU Philip N. Johnson-Laird
%AU Patricia E. Barres
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 475-478
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB We describe an algorithm that constructs mental models of assertions
    containing sentential connectives, such as and, if, and or.  It
    performs at three levels of expertise depending on the completeness
    of the models it constructs.  At a rudimentary level of performance,
    it constructs models that make explicit as little as possible.  One
    unexpected consequence is that it produces the same explicit models
    for assertions of the form:
        if p then q, and if r then s
        if p then q, or if r then s
        p and q, or r and s.
    We initially suspected that there was a bug in the algorithm (or
    theory), but there was not.  We therefore carried out two
    experiments with logically-untrained subjects.  Their results
    confirmed the phenomena: for many individuals, a conjunction of
    conditionals is equivalent to their disjunction, which in turn is
    equivalent to a disjunction of conjunctions.

%TI Levels of Semantic Constraint and Learning Novel Words
%AU James M. Lampinen
%AU Jeremiah M. Faries
%PU Proc. CogSci-94, pp. 531-536
%SC Monday, August 15, 4-5:30
%AB A common method of teaching vocabulary involves presenting students
    with new words in context and having the students derive the meaning
    of these words based on contextual cues.  Beck, McKeown and McCaslin
    (1983) have argued that the contexts used to teach new words should
    be highly constraining.  Although highly constraining contexts avoid
    ambiguity they do not present the learner with the necessity of
    com