Project Plan
Team: DNA
Grade: (94 out of 100)
The following is a breakdown of the grading.
Schedule (48/50 pts)
In general, an excellent schedule. My only worry is that you are
overlooking some of the admin/documentation/editing tasks.
Important points:
- clarity (Can I interpret the table?)
- completeness (enough activities indicated?): You haven't listed
time to do required documentation. Where will that fit in? I really
appreciate your focus on the technical agenda of the project. You
clearly have at least one person in the group who has a firm grasp on
the big picture and the technical know-how to direct the activities.
- indication of milestones: Please add these to the overview table.
- time estimates for activities: good
- role assignment: good
Comments:
Project Description (20/20 pts)
Important points:
- length (approx one page) OK
- clarity (use of English) OK
- specificity (Can I tell what you are going to do?) OK, I tried
out the demo, but it didn't work when I clicked to see the current winner.
Comments:
The Web meets the lava lamp! Check out
this
paper on calming technology.
Related Documents (9/10 pts)
OK, but a little more text justifying why these documents are linked
to would be good. Might just be a matter of borrowing some of the text
in the description section.
Roles (8/10 pts)
Are personnel defined with respect to roles on team?
List names of people filling roles here as well.
Deliverables (9/10 pts)
Descriptions of documents and pointers?
Add dates.