Text:
Papers will be made available outside of College of Computing 136, to be copied by students;
plus websites
(Dates and readings subject to some change)
Date |
Topic | Readings |
| Mar 31 | Overview, who y'all are, what Janet does |   |
| Apr 2 | Introduction: constructivism, social cognition, learning by doing, ... | Setting a CS Research Agenda |
| Apr 7 | Philosophy: Intelligent Tutoring Systems | Anderson |
| Apr 9 | Philosophy: Case-Based Reasoning, Problem-Based Learning, Goal-Based Scenarios | Kolodner and Schank |
| Apr 14 | Philosophy: Constructionism | Papert |
| Apr 16 | Philosophy: Cognitive Apprenticeship | Collins and Brown |
| Apr 21 | Technology: Multimedia Homework #1 Due | Kozma |
| Apr 23 | Technology: Collaboration technologies | Koschmann, Kolodner & Guzdial selections from recent CSCL workshop |
| Apr 28 | Discussion of Homework #1 Comparison of 4 web sites, especially their philosophies | Look at all four web sites in preparation; read class Swiki |
| Apr 30 | Designing: How do people learn? | Anderson, Reder & Simon Greeno reply Anderson et al. rejoinder |
| May 5 | Designing: Learner-Centered Design | Soloway, etc. |
| May 7 | Designing: Goal-Based Scenarios | Schank, Engines for Ed |
| May 12 | Designing: Students as programmers | Koshmann, O'Shea, Papert, Soloway Media Lab website |
| May 14 | Designing: Roles of teachers Homework #2 due | Schofield Tabak & Reiser |
| May 19 | Discussion of Homework #2: what technologies are appropriate where and how? | class Swiki pages |
| May 21 | Evaluation: How do we evaluate? Formative and summative evaluation | Neff Walker's primer |
| May 26 | Evaluation: Complexities of real classrooms | Ann Brown |
| May 28 June 2 June 4 | Student Presentations of Designs | class Swiki pages |
Post your paper on the Swiki and hand in a paper copy.
Oral and written presentations should present both the product and the process of getting to it. Descriptions of environments should address (1) who the audience is perceived to be, (2) learning objectives, (3) known student needs and how they are being considered, (4) teacher's needs and teacher's roles (if any) and how those are being considered, (5) how your environment can fit into the technology infrastructure currently available in that educational setting, (6) how you expect it to fit into the culture of the educational setting, (7) any other factors that might impact its success or failure, (8) refinements you might expect to have to make after trial, and (9) how you will recognize and measure its success. Make sure to include two to four mocked-up screenshots. Tell us, as well, about other serious alternatives you considered and why you preferred your final one.
Groups of two to four are encouraged.