 CS 6751B
Winter Term 1999
Wallace and Gromit are the property
of Aardman Animations..
|
Beagle: a hunter of documents for
the legal profession.
|
Problem Statement
Law firms, by
the nature of legal work and court requirements, are required
to keep hard copy and associated paper documents of much of
their work. Unfortunately, the paper filing systems, used to
keep these documents, have numerous shortcomings, resulting
in excessive time to retrieve items, real and intangible
costs, frustration, and in some cases lost documents and
information. An inability to reliably retrieve information
and documents, previously stored, can mean the difference
between winning and losing a case. The loss of an original
contract document can result in the unenforceability of an
agreement with the associated loss of large sums of money.
The nature of a law firm's work demands extremely reliable
retrieval accuracy of previously stored documents.
The shortcomings are the
result of human mistakes and slips, which are provoked by the
current design of the system. Personnel file documents
incorrectly. They lose documents. They forget where they have
filed documents or forget to return them to the file. They
many times do not relate to the filed documents the way their
boss does.
The retrieval accuracy of
paper file systems can be improved by changing the faulty
retrieval model currently in use. A major problem in life is
retrieving information, or an item, you have placed
somewhere. To retrieve either, you must first retrieve, in
human memory, the physical location of, or a map to, the
information or item. You also can recognize much more
information than you can recall.
When these
concepts are extended to storage and retrieval systems, we
believe many mistakes and slips, related to paper filing
systems in law firms, can be reduced. To reduce mistakes and
slips, we intend to model a new retrieval system after our
understanding of the retrieval system of human memory. How
does the human memory best find papers and documents in a
paper filing system?
Environment
The insights
into the working environment of a law firm and its paper
filing system was obtained through over 3 1/2 hours of
interviews of the partner-in-charge, a lawyer and a paralegal
in the environmental law department of a large, Atlanta
based, general practice law firm. This firm has more than 150
lawyers and a total employment of approximately 300. Annual
billings for 1998 are kept confidential but are more than ten
million dollars. The firm has numerous specialties. The
practice involves doing legal work for clients which includes
wills, divorces, trust and estate planning, tax law,
securities law, intellectual property (patent) law, contract
law, business law, real estate law, and complex environmental
and business litigation. Typical employees are Partners,
lawyers, paralegal, administrative assistants, secretaries,
clerks and other miscellaneous support personnel. Revenue is
generating by hourly billings of the partner, lawyer and
paralegal time spent working on legal work called
"matters". Other knowledge of the law practice
environment existed within the project team through a
member's extensive environmental litigation experience as a
client.
The firm's systems are
representative of a large modern day law firm with extensive
computer aided facilities such as word processors, billing
computers, networking, e-mail, OCR scanners, databases,
database services, reproduction and FAX and communication
facilities.
The law firm must maintain
an extensive manual file system for much of its document
retrieval, since the law profession and most courts require
and maintain "hard copy" for legal documents. There
is some tendency to move toward electronic filing and
maintenance of some documents (e-mail, internal
correspondence, outgoing correspondence, internally generated
and OCR scanned documents). However many electronically
stored documents are maintained as hardcopy in manual filing
systems. Retrieval accuracy of documents is highly sought
after.
Filing Systems
The law firm interviewed has
two major filing concepts in place. The first is a system
that serves the everyday needs. The second is a portable file
system that serves the lawyer in a deposition or, when they
go to trial in a courtroom.
- Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs
This system serves the
practice's everyday storage and retrieval needs for
the paper products that must be filed accurately for
later retrieval. The major category in the file
structure is keyed according to a "matter"
number. This number represents the client or
customer, and the "matter", or legal issue,
they are working on for the client. The client is
issued this number, primarily for billing purposes
and, each job or "matter" is added to the
last digits. As an example a number of 48316.04 would
be representative of client # 48316 and the
"matter" or issue is # 04. When the matter
is opened, items start making their way to the
sections of the file cabinets associated with that
"matter" number. When a "matter"
is closed, the entire "matter" file is
placed in cardboard file boxes and removed to a
long-term storage area. The hierarchical
structure used under the "matter" category
and methods of organization are as follows:
| Category
|
Methods of
organization |
|
Matter
|
Labeled
by Subject, client and matter #. |
|
|
Incoming and
outgoing. Filed by date as you would in a pile. Find
it by thumbing through the file. |
|
|
Filed by date as
you would in a pile. Find it by thumbing through the
file. |
|
|
Phone logs, memos
to others in law firm. |
|
|
Research on a point
of law or reports about a subject. |
|
|
Filed by date as
you would in a pile. Find it by thumbing through the
file. |
- Attorney's
Handwritten Notes
|
Filed by date as
you would in a pile. Find it by thumbing through the
file. |
|
|
Documents given to
attorneys for safekeeping. Filed by date as you would
in a pile. Find it by thumbing through the file. |
|
|
Examples are
filings with the court and orders from the court.
These documents comprise anything to do with a court
case that is handled by the court's clerk or by other
attorneys associated with the case. Filed by date as
you would in a pile. However, the legal document
description and the date of the document are entered
into a log, or index, that is placed in the front of
this file category. This index is generated in a word
processor and also electronically stored. The
document is found by first going to the log and
visually viewing it to locate the document. Find the
associated date and browse the chronologically
ordered file to retrieve it. |
- Production
or Source Documents
|
These are documents
that are supplied by the client or witnesses relating
to the litigation "matter." They also may
be supplied by opposing parties' witnesses. It is
material relevant to a case. The document is assigned
a "Bates" number and a barcode and stored
in "Bates" numerical order in the
file. A paralegal is responsible for
maintaining and controlling access to this file,
unlike the rest of the "Main Filing
System." These documents will later be used to
make up a deposition file or courtroom portable file
described in the "Trial/Courtroom File
System" later in this document. Filed in
"Bates" order. Find it by visually looking
at the "Bates" number ordered list from the
computer generated by searching on words, categories
or keys originally entered into the database. |
|
|
Filed by date as
you would in a pile. Find it by thumbing through the
file. |
- One of the firm's
lawyers, who the project team interviewed, made an
interesting comment. He stated that he sometimes
files important documents in multiple places, for
backup purposes, in case one gets lost in the file
system or someone takes it out and doesn't return it
to the file. There is apparently no way for someone
to know who has a document out of the file. There is
no document tracking system.
Trial/Courtroom
File System-Portable
A database, such as
Microsoft Access, is used to index documents for a
trial or deposition, since the documents must be
readily accessible in real time fashion. The
lawyer(s) participating in the courtroom proceeding
or deposition give(s) a paralegal the items or
his/her recollection of subject matter needed for the
trial. It is the paralegal's responsibility to
retrieve all documents requested and all documents
associated with the subjects requested. The paralegal
must further organize the documents into a portable
file system for rapid retrieval in the courtroom or
deposition environment. Retrieval must be in a matter
of seconds.
Documents are
assigned a sequential "Bates" number by the
paralegal and labeled with a barcode. The document is
barcode and OCR scanned into the computer and
Information about the document is entered into
database fields for later retrieval.
Documents are placed
in a file box with file folders that are numbered
sequentially by "Bates" number and indexed
to the subject matter in the computer. The portable
file is physically organized, according to witness,
in separate boxes. The paralegal is the primary
organizer of the file. It is painstaking and
laborious work, especially since, files must be
sought, retrieved and OCR scanned, to make up the
portable file.
The "by
witness" organization provides for faster
accessing since, when a witness is on the stand, all
the files for that witness are physically located in
a limited number of boxes. A large trial may have 20
to 30 file boxes or more.
The primary user of
the file in the courtroom or deposition is the same
paralegal that made up the file. Their function is to
support the courtroom or deposition attorney(s) with
file documents. While a witness is being questioned,
the paralegal is concurrently searching the database
for documents based on the subjects of the questions.
The paralegal retrieves (either electronically on the
display screen or the physical paper) the appropriate
document from the file.
A newer file system
uses outside firms to scan the source documents,
which make up the portable files, with an OCR
scanner. The image of the document will be stored
electronically and printed, if needed, in the
deposition or courtroom proceeding. The number of
boxes of physical files is reduced. The software
associated with these new vendors was described as an
"enhanced word search." The software
searches on key words from the OCR scan.
Description of
Users
- The users are those
personnel found in a legal office who perform the
duties of maintaining the file system. These
personnel are those with titles of Clerk, Secretary,
Administrative Assistant and Paralegal. Others who
may not maintain the system but may retrieve items
from the system are titled Lawyers and Partners.
Authority increases from left to right.
Maintainers of
the File System
These categories of
users generally have at least a high school
education, can use a word processor and are familiar
with paper filing systems. Talent and experience will
vary. This user maintains the file system, creating
categories, making up file labels, filing documents,
retrieving documents and cross referencing and
entering documents into a database when necessary.
The Paralegal has a
college education and is computer literate He/she is
the most proficient user of the file system,
especially in categorizing, indexing, entering
documents into the database and retrieving them. The
typing skill increases with higher level titles and
thus, the data entry abilities at a keyboard. There
is a variation of ability to categorize items for
filing for later retrieval. There are differences in
ability to remember categories of filed documents and
where items were filed. The closer the person is to
the entity requesting the filing, the more likely
they are to relate to the category used in filing a
document. The further away the person is from the
entity requesting the filing, the less likely they
are to remember the category and where filed. The
person requesting the filing or, the maintainer
closest to that person must determine the category to
retrieve the document filed. This only works
efficiently if the requestor and the filing person
are informational closely coupled.
Time plays an important
factor in the accuracy of retrieval. The further away
from the filing incident, that retrieval is
requested, the harder it is to retrieve. In 1 year
files could be in cardboard boxes in another
building. Efficient file retrieval depends heavily on
the talents of the filing or retrieving person.
Lawyers and
Partners
This category is pretty
much dependent on the "maintainers" of the
file system, since they don't relate to the locations
of the documents in the filing system. When they do
access the file system directly, it is a more
laborious process. Even though these users are highly
educated (law school being a post-graduate degree)
and, in possession of a very good human memory
retrieval system for the law and its associated facts
and data, they lack the mappings to the proper
locations of documents in the file system for
retrieval purposes.
Human Memory
A major problem in life
is retrieving information, or an item, you have
placed somewhere. To retrieve either, you must first
retrieve, in human memory, the physical location of,
or a map to, the information or item. So, the problem
of retrieving any piece of information or any item is
one of first retrieving the information or storage
location from the human memory. Therefore, any
retrieval system, to be effective must be modeled
after the retrieval system of the human memory. How
does the human memory find information or storage
locations of items? Our best attempt to explain this
phenomenal human ability is to look at the way we
remember. Our understanding today of this ability may
be completely different tomorrow. So, with
humbleness, we should allow for the ultimate
flexibility to change our model on a moment's notice.
Work by E. Tulving
in the early 60's concluded:
"not
only was the subject able to recognize more
than he was able to recall, suggesting that
he knew more than his recall indicates, but
much more powerfully that the experimenter
was able to use retrieval cues to
manipulative the probability that an item
would or would not be accessible to the
subject" 1
We polled a law
firm, our project group and others to determine how
they remembered pieces of information. What were
their retrieval "cues." We comprised the
following list:
- Keys
-a name or a number or description.
- Context-the
set of circumstances or facts that surround a
piece of information or item, scenarios.
- Time-when
did it happen?
- Location-where
were you when it occurred?
- Subject-what
subjects were involved?
- People-what
people were involved?
- Event-what
event were you at or the happening that the
information occurred at?
- Type-the
set of categories or characteristics: report,
letter, picture, memo, book, newspaper, etc.
- Visual-Color-shape,
textures, patterns, movement, scenes, etc.
- Auditory-sounds,
music, speech, noise, etc.
- Feel-shape,
texture, pressure including sound,
irritations, etc.
- Pain-physical,
emotional.
- Pleasure-physical,
emotional.
- Smell-fragrance,
good, bad, etc.
- Taste-sweet,
sour, etc.
- Intuition-undefined,
sixth sense.
In most cases we
remember information utilizing these mappings. In
other words, we do not go directly to the information
in our memories, but indirectly through some stimulus
or helper path.
More infrequently,
we possibly access the information directly in our
memories, but most of the time we need helpers or
"cues." We may not be conscious of them.
This probably works similarly in short term and long
term memory but because it is assumed that most
information is stored in long term memory, mapping
occurs most frequently in accessing information
there.
We believe a limited
subset of these "cues" or human memory
recall techniques apply to an office filing system of
paper documents. From the list above they are:
-
- Keys
-A name or a number or description.
- Context-The
set of circumstances or facts that surround a
piece of information or item, scenarios.
- Time-When
did it happen?
- Location-Where
were you when it occurred?
- Subject-What
subjects were involved?
- People-What
people were involved?
- Event-What
event were you at or the happening that the
information occurred at?
- Type-The
set of categories or characteristics: report,
letter, picture, memo, book, newspaper, etc.
- Visual-Color,
shape, textures, patterns, movement, scenes,
etc.
Task Analysis
The task
analysis technique chosen is Task Decomposition and in
particular is a Hierarchical Task Analysis. The 2
major tasks chosen to analyze are the retrieval and storage
of documents in the law firm's filing systems.Note that the
entire file system is composed of 4 major subsystems: Main
Filing System-Everyday Needs, Main filing System-Everyday
Needs-Pleadings, Main Filing System-Everyday Needs-Production
and Source Documents, and Portable File.
Retrieval
request documents
(Partner, Lawyer, Paralegal
clarify
document request (description key words,
categories, etc.)
determine major
filing system location
associate
request with possible location in Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs, Main Filing System
Everyday Needs -Pleadings, Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs--Production and Source
Documents, or Portable File.
retrieve
documents from files (Paralegal,
Administrative Assistant, Secretary, Clerk)
retrieve
documents from Main Filing
System-Everyday Filing Needs
(Paralegal, Administrative Assistant,
Secretary, Clerk)
associate
request with possible
categories ( i.e. attorney's
notes, correspondence, etc. )
of document locations
determine
most likely date of documents
associate
categories and date with
possible physical location
locate
document
inquire
in most likely category
and date file
if
not found, inquire in
next most likely
categories and so on
until found
retrieve
document
if
not found, search next most
probable major file system
if
all other major file systems
searched, punt and prepare to
report lost file to
requesting party
retrieve
document from Main Filing
System-Everyday Filing
Needs--Pleadings (Paralegal,
Administrative Assistant, Secretary,
Clerk)
locate
documents in list of
documents at front of file or
in word processor
determine
dates of documents from list
retrieve
documents
if
not found, search next most
probable major file system
if
all other major file systems
searched, punt and prepare to
report lost file to
requesting party
retrieve
document from Main Filing
System-Everyday Filing
Needs--Production and Source
Documents file (Paralegal)
associate
request with possible
categories of document
locations
enter
most likely categories (or
AND combinations of
categories) into search
computer, as a word or field
search, to generate a list of
possible documents
find
location of document from
list produced
view
produced list of
suggested documents
if
not in list, enter next
most likely categories or
key words (or AND
combinations of
categories or key words)
as a word or field
search, and so on, until
found
retrieve
documents
pull
documents from files
scan
barcode
retrieve
electronically
retrieve
electronically and print
if
not found, search next most
probable major file system
if
all other major file systems
searched, punt and prepare to
report lost file to
requesting party
retrieve
documents from Portable File
(Paralegal)
associate
request with possible
categories of document
locations
enter
most likely categories (or
AND combinations of
categories) into search
computer, as a word or field
search, to generate a list of
possible documents
find
location of document from
list produced
view
produced list of
suggested documents
if
not in list, enter next
most likely categories or
key words (or AND
combinations of
categories or key words)
as a word or field
search, and so on, until
found
retrieve
documents
pull
documents from files
scan
barcode
retrieve
electronically
retrieve
electronically and print
if
not found, search next most
probable major file system
if
all other major file systems
searched, really punt and
prepare to report lost file
to requesting party
supply
documents, electronic screen or printed
documents to requestor
if unable to
retrieve, report lost document to requestor
and run
receive documents
fuss if documents not
found
Storage
request documents'
storage (Partner, Lawyer, Paralegal)
- receive
documents (Paralegal, Administrative
Assistant, Secretary, Clerk)
- store documents
( Paralegal, Administrative Assistant,
Secretary, Clerk)
- store
documents in Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs--Production and
Source Documents in electronic and
physical files and enter into
location and descriptions into
database (Paralegal)
- encode
documents
- assign
each document a
"Bates" number
(unique sequential
number)
- assign
each document a barcode
- scan
each document barcode
into computer
- scan
and OCR each document
into computer
- enter
info about each document into
database
- enter
"Bates" numbers
into computer database
for each document
- enter
keywords or multiword
strings into database for
each document
- file
documents by
"Bates" number in
sequential order in file
- file
documents in Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs-- Pleadings
physical storage and enter into
manual and word processor list
(Paralegal, Administrative Assistant,
Secretary, Clerk)
- determine
category or description of
documents
- enter
category or description and
date of documents into word
processor list in
chronological order
- print
new list
- file
documents in chronological
date order in file
- place
list in front of file or
replace old list with new
list
- file
all other documents in Main Filing
System-Everyday Needs that do not go
in above files (Paralegal,
Administrative Assistant, Secretary,
Clerk)
- determine
date of documents
- locate
storage area for documents
based on major category (i.
e. correspondence, attorney's
handwritten notes, etc.)
- file
documents in sequential date
order
User's
Cognitive Model of Existing System
The model described here
will be based on how a paralegal performs the duties of
maintaining the completely manual filing date ordered system
with no index (low-end system) and the portable one (high end
system).
- The Main
Filing System (manual version)
| GOAL:
store document |
| GOAL:
locate storage
cabinet for the document |
|
identify
the "matter" number
|
|
GOAL:
find
a correct section in file cabinet
|
|
locate
a section for the matter
|
|
open
the section
|
|
GOAL:
find
file
|
|
locate
files based on a
classification of
document
|
|
GOAL:
put
the document in a file holder
|
|
identify
date of the document
insert into holder in
chronological order
|
| GOAL:
retrieve
documents |
|
GOAL:
locate
storage for the document
|
identify
the "matter"
number
identify
the classification of
document
identify
the date and/or subject
|
|
GOAL: find the
correct section in file cabinets
|
locate
a section for the matter
open
the section
|
|
GOAL:
find
correct file holder
|
|
locate
file holder based on
classification of
document
|
|
GOAL:
fetch document
|
|
thumb
through those files until
date and/or subject
identifies document
|
| GOAL:
create a file by
witness |
identify
the matter number
identify
the witness
|
|
GOAL:
find
relevant documents
|
think
of key words, subjects,
document classifications
and locations to search
for documents
make
a list of documents and
classifications
|
| GOAL:
retrieve
documents |
|
Note:
same as above
|
|
GOAL:
prepare
documents for filing
|
stamp
"Bates" number
on document
put
barcode on document
|
|
GOAL:
enter
document into database
|
scan
barcode into computer
OCR
scan document into
computer
enter
all relevant info about
document into
computer
|
|
GOAL:
place
document in portable filing boxes
|
locate
folders
put
"Bates" number
on folder
put
"Bates"
numbered document into
same numbered folder
|
|
GOAL:
retrieve
document
|
identify
witness
identify
subject by key word,
subject or document
classification
|
|
GOAL:
find
document location
|
input
key word, subject or
document classification
visually
scan list on screen
identify
"Bates" number
|
|
|
|
determine
if electronic or hard
copy
|
|
GOAL:
retrieve
electronic view
|
|
fetch
document to screen
|
|
GOAL: retrieve
hard copy
|
locate
box with correct range of
"Bates" numbers
identify
folder with
"Bates" number
remove
document from folder
|
Usability Criterion
HCI
Issues
In our examination of the
problems associated with the law firm's filing systems we
determined that the following HCI principles should be
designed in any new system.
- Learnability is
a measure of how hard it is for a new user to become
proficient with the system. The old system does have
the advantage of being easy to learn because it has
been in existence for some time and users have
experience with it from other companies and law
firms. Our system must not reduce learnability.
We will attempt to
maximize the principles of Familiarity and Consistency.
The users presently use database systems. The Familiarity
with those systems will provide for simple migration.
Predictability will be required, since menu
actions should be the same for all like searches,
regardless of category or subject searched on.
Flexibility
- Flexibility is a
measure of how many different ways a user can
accomplish a task. This will be one of the major
areas of improvement in the new system. The old
system was not flexible since, it made you follow one
path (matter number, subject, date) to find a
particular document. Our new system will offer many
different paths, any of which can be used when trying
to find a given document. In particular, Dialog
Initiative should provide the user with a
prompted search or allow the user the ability to
initiate their method of search.
- Robustness
Robustness is
a measure of how much support we give the user to
help him achieve his goals. There should be a rich
environment of "cues" and methods for
finding documents. Observability will be
enhanced through extensive browsability
through a menu of "cues." There were few
"cues" in the old system. Recoverability
will be a principal feature in the new system. The
system will provide the ability to browse backwards
and forwards, and directly jump to, any of the
"cues" for further choices. The old system
had some forward and backward browsing but the
"cue" browsing was what you could remember rather than what you could recognize. The new system will aid you
in recognizing "cues."
Beagle: a hunter of documents for the
legal profession
We believe that the retrieval
of filed documents can best be enhanced by aiding the user to
recognize categories, words, subjects and other
mappings, uniquely associated with a document and the file
system, rather than depending on a user to recall them (see User Analysis, Human
Memory). You can recognize much more than you can recall, according to Tulving's work.1
The current file systems, in
the law firm examined, have a number of advantages. A major
advantage is its existence for over 10 years. Personnel are
familiar with it. Other advantages are its similarity with
other file systems in other law firms and corporations. New
personnel can learn it quickly. Retrieval is quick for small
systems, even in the "date organized" filing
"piles." The newer Portable File uses a current
database software package to quickly find documents.
The advantages of the system
are still at the mercy of its main disadvantages. You must
correctly file documents in a recallable location, relate the
location of the document to the data entered, and be able to
remember the recall keys (primarily numbers, dates and words)
which you previously entered or were scanned from the
document. Most documents have no tracking when removed from
the file, which leads to lost items.
Beagle will addresses a major drawback of
the file system: remembering the keys, categories or words
that allow you to locate a document. Beagle will operate on the principal or
recognizing rather than recalling keys and categories. It
will not preclude early recall, but will aid you in
recognizing how you might recall. It will provide you with
"cues." If the first attempt doesn't find the
document, prompts and support structures will help you
recall.
Beagle will have a hierarchical prompting
menu what will continue to prompt you in the next most
probable ways you might recall a document. You will recognize
from the prompting that you can remember a name, or a meeting
place or a subject that relates to the document. You might
not have tried, without the prompt. In addition, you can view
the hierarchy of the most probable recall techniques and go
straight to one. For example, you may be able to recall a
date quickly, and not need to go through 2 levels of prompts
to find the document. You recognized, from the recall
hierarchical structure, that the date could retrieve the
document and you recalled it.
When filing a document, the
hierarchical prompting tree will aid in the correct choice of
keys and field information for the database. This will help
prevent slips in recalling keys or categories for later
retrieval, since the same hierarchical model is used for
storing and retrieving.
The learnability of Beagle is expected to be high since, much of
the organization of the existing file system will remain.
Expert users, such as the Paralegal, are familiar with
computers and database software. Physical organization of
file folders and cabinets will be the same. Input devices for
documents, such as scanners and OCR software, will remain the
same.
Usability
Criteria Measurements
- We will improve
Learnability with Beagle by Consistency.
As an example we will search for all
documents the same way. The documents
will be searched for with the menu prompts in
Beagle.
You will no longer be physically thumbing
through a large file folder for one type of
file, guessing words for a search in a
different file, or looking at an index in the
front of another file.
Measurement of
Consistency
We will
measure Consistency by having someone
file 10 documents in each of the 4 different
files, Main Filing System-Everyday Needs,
Main Filing System Everyday Needs -Pleadings,
Main Filing System-Everyday Needs-Production and
Source Documents, or Portable File. We will
then enter these same documents into the new
system and time the difference in retrieval
for 20 documents.
Flexibility
Dialog
Initiative
- We will improve
Flexibility with Beagle by Dialog
Initiative. The depth of the prompting
menu allows a user to go to a very deep level
in trying to find documents as opposed to the
previous electronic systems, which have you
guess at information to search for it. Beagle will continue to
suggest search criteria.
- Measurement
of Dialog Initiative
- Dialog
Initiative will be measured by disabling
the menu selections after the first two
prompts or "cues" in searching for
documents. This removes user flexibility of
requesting more "cues." The user
must now find by keyword. We will fix the
amount of time the user has to find documents
and count the documents foundbefore and after
disabling.
- Observability
will improve the Robustness with Beagle. For example, the
menu has browsability. You can explore the
depth of the menu selection from the
beginning interface selections. You can
bypass menu selected prompts or select any
depth of the hierarchical menu tree.
Measurement of
Observability
Observability
will be measured by determining how many
"cues" you must use to find 10
documents. We will compare the number of
"cues" (words) to find the
documents in the old system (electronic word
search) versus the number of "cues"
(menu choices) in the new system.
References
1.
Alan Baddeley. Human Memory (pp 194), Needham Heights,
MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1990.
2. Michael W.
Eysenck, Principals of Cognitive Psychology, Hove, UK:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Ltd., 1993.
3. Donald A.
Norman, The Design of Everyday Things, New York, NY:
Doubleday, 1988.
4. Alan Dix,
Janet Finlay, Gregory Abowd, Russell Beale, Human-Computer
Interaction,
Second Edition, Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall
Europe, 1998.