Design Document Regrade

Team: Scooby2bedue

Grade: (97 out of 100)

The following is a breakdown of the grading.

Document presentation (5 out of 5)

Important points:

Organization: OK
Document author: OK
use of English: OK

Comments:

Project Description of Target System (5 out of 5)

Link to other documents? OK

Comments:

High-level architecture (28 out of 30)

static description (box-and-line type diagram, or suitable substitute): The control and data flow edges are not accurate. Java interpreter executes the applet, you have shown that they exchange data. I can understand this from the description.
dynamic description (Can I tell how the system executes over time?) good job
use of standard or understandable notations:
completeness: OK

Comments:

Design specification (29 out of 30)

module/class definitions (identified, interfaces provided):Ok
following a prescribed method (mainly for OO people): Ok. In addition, it would be useful to document any design choices you made and the rationale for them.
use of standard or understandable notations: OK
completeness:Ok

Comments:

User Interface (30 out of 30)

where relevant, is the human interface well-defined? yes
evidence of UI design (screens, drawings, etc.) yes

Comments: