Requirements Document Comments
Team: Scooby2bedue
Grade: (95 out of 100)
The following is a breakdown of the grading.
Document presentation (5 out of 5)
Important points:
- Organization: OK
- Document author: OK
- use of English: OK
Comments:
Project Description of Target System (10 out of 10)
Comments: good
Scenario descriptions (10 out of 10)
- 3 scenarios provided: yes
- level of description: very good
- clarity: good
Comments:
Storyboarding (10 out of 10)
- Evidence of storyboarding: multiple versions, showing evolution
- Connection with scenarios: OK
Comments
Functional Requirements (25 out of 25)
- Number of requirements: 5 categories
- Clarity of description: brief but clear
- Decomposition: good
- Prioritization: OK
Comments:
Non-Functional Requirements (15 out of 15)
- Variety: good
- Measurability: yes, where applicable you listed the test suite
used for the telnet connection
Comments:
Platform and Network Environment (5 out of 10)
- Vehicle platform: OK
- Development platform: not described
Comments:
Risk Analysis (15 out of 15)
- Risks identified: 3
- Alternate strategies identified: yes
Comments:
If you wish to have your Requirements Document regraded, revise it
within one week of receiving comments. Be sure to maintain a link to
the original version of the Requirements Document in your notebook for
comparison purposes. To get a regrade, you must send e-mail to the
instructor requesting the regrade.