Design Document Grading

Team: Jestre

Grade: (100 out of 100)

The following is a breakdown of the grading.

Document presentation (5 out of 5)

Important points:

Organization: OK
Document author: OK
use of English: OK

Comments: Excellent job!

Project Description of Target System (5 out of 5)

Link to other documents? yes

Comments:

High-level architecture (30 out of 30)

static description (box-and-line type diagram, or suitable substitute): good
dynamic description (Can I tell how the system executes over time?): yes
use of standard or understandable notations: not great, but OK
completeness: OK

Comments:

Design specification (30 out of 30)

module/class definitions (identified, interfaces provided)
following a prescribed method (mainly for OO people) yes, well done! Whoever taught you how to do such brilliant object-oriented design? :)
use of standard or understandable notations: yes
completeness: pretty good

Comments: Now, how straightforward is it going to be to go from this to the Java code?

User Interface (30 out of 30)

where relevant, is the human interface well-defined? yes, and it looks good.
evidence of UI design (screens, drawings, etc.) OK

Comments:

If you wish to have your Design Document regraded, revise it within one week of receiving comments. Be sure to maintain a link to the original version of the Design Document in your notebook for comparison purposes. To get a regrade, you must send e-mail to the instructor requesting the regrade.