Project Plan Grading Template

Team: NO (name for now)

Grade: (98 out of 100)

The following is a breakdown of the grading.

Document presentation (9/10 pts)

Important points:

Organization - good
Name/logo - good, efficient re-use of Cyberguide logo. :)
Document author - OK
project team members/roles - who is the manager?
use of English - OK

Desirable features:

Innovation

Comments: You did an OUTSTANDING job on this document.

Project Description (22/20 pts)

Important points:

length (approx one page) - Just what I was looking for. I commend you on effective re-use of existing documentation and acknowledgement.
clarity (use of English) - very well written
specificity (Can I tell what you are going to do?) - well done

Comments:

Project Schedule (32/35 pts)

Important points:

clarity (Can I interpret the table?) - Are the number of "x"'s significant? If so, please indicate this.
completeness (enough activities indicated?) - OK
indication of milestones - Yes. I suggest you make the annotations links to the actual document when it is available and in the meantime just a link to the deliverable description as you did at the bottom of the table.

Extra bonus:

innovative use of table to indicate schedule information - good indication of deliverables
good use of links - OK to link to deliverable overview for now. Could link activity names to activity descriptions.

Comments:

Activities description (35/35 pts)

Important points:

completeness (all scheduled activities described; descriptions are detailed enough to indicate what work is done) - OK
time estimates for activities - OK, but be sure to keep track of actual time spent on activities so schedule can be updated.
role assignment - OK
clarity of descriptions of activities - OK

Comments:

If you want to have your grade reconsidered for this document, you must hand in a new version within one week and address the comments made in this initial grading. After regrading, the new grade will override the original one.