Requirements Document Regrade

Team: Yakko Wakko and Dot Dayplan

Grade: (101 out of 100)

The following is a breakdown of the grading. Based on Version 2.

Document presentation (4 out of 5)

Important points:

Organization -
Document author -
use of English - need to work on the grammar in parts

Comments:

Project Description of Target System (10 out of 10)

Comments:

Scenario descriptions (10 out of 10)

3 scenarios provided -
level of description -
clarity -

Comments:

Storyboarding (12 out of 10)

Evidence of storyboarding - yes, and you did even more now
Connection with scenarios - well done

Comments: Outstanding work, guys!

Functional Requirements (25 out of 25)

Number of requirements - 8 divided into three groups.
Clarity of description -
Decomposition -
Prioritization -

Comments: You addressed both of my previous criticisms.

Non-Functional Requirement (15 out of 15)

Clarity - This is better. You need to correct the grammar in this section.
Measurability - still a little weak
Variety -

Comments:

Platform and Network Environment (10 out of 10)

Vehicle platform - OK
Development platform - good

Comments:

Risk Analysis (15 out of 15)

Risks identified - good
Alternate strategies identified - Yes, but what is going on with the Java Jam sessions?

Comments: