| Project |
Grade |
Comments |
ATM (Backup) |
9 |
Good evaluation criteria, quantitative data and cpmparisons with original system.
Some confusions in data reporting: motivation of task #10 (action after exit from the system)? why unbriefed user performs better than briefed? tables of raw data are hard to read.
|
BannerRegistration (Backup) |
9 |
Good qulitative evaluation, suggested improvements.
More concrete objective and comparison to prior system would help.
|
CareerServices (Backup) |
7 |
Good qualitative feedback and problem identification.
No evaluation criteria.
No direct comparison to prior system.
Need more concrete questions, data, and actual, measurable tasks with the interface.
|
CareerServices- Registration |
10 |
Well done.
|
Co-opResume (Backup) |
8 |
Good subjective evaluation, problem finding, and recommandations.
Need evaluation criteria and more objective task evaluation.
|
| ELM |
8 |
Good finding of interface problems.
No comparison with old system.
No evaluation criteria.
Needs better reporting of results.
|
GTTSS (Backup) |
6 |
Report is too brief.
No motivation or evaluation criteria for questionnaire and tasks.
Tasks too simple.
No objective task data.
No comparison to prior system.
|
Minesweeper (Backup) |
8 |
Nice evaluation criteria.
Need more quantitative data and feedback.
|
OSCAR (Backup) |
8 |
Good evaluation criteria and comparison to previous.
Questionnaire results could be presented better.
Motivation on choosing click measure?
Motivation on tasks all not related to the main function of the system?
|
| OSCAR-Web |
8 |
Nice and thorough tasks and questionnaire.
Comparison to previous system would help.
Report is sloppy.
|
Solitaire (Backup) |
8 |
Good qualitative evaluation.
Quantitative data from questionnaires would help.
Evaluation criteria missing.
|
TotalScheduling (Backup) |
9 |
Nice objective and subjective comparison to previous system.
Report doesn't flow very well.
Need task motivation and evaluation criteria.
|
Win95Calculator (Backup) |
8 |
Good identification of interface problems.
Missing task and questionnaire motivation.
Need objective comparison to prior system.
|