CS 4753 Fall '96: Project Part 3

Project Grade Comments
ATM
(Backup)
9
  • Good evaluation criteria, quantitative data and cpmparisons with original system.
  • Some confusions in data reporting: motivation of task #10 (action after exit from the system)? why unbriefed user performs better than briefed? tables of raw data are hard to read.
  • BannerRegistration
    (Backup)
    9
  • Good qulitative evaluation, suggested improvements.
  • More concrete objective and comparison to prior system would help.
  • CareerServices
    (Backup)
    7
  • Good qualitative feedback and problem identification.
  • No evaluation criteria.
  • No direct comparison to prior system.
  • Need more concrete questions, data, and actual, measurable tasks with the interface.
  • CareerServices-
    Registration
    10
  • Well done.
  • Co-opResume
    (Backup)
    8
  • Good subjective evaluation, problem finding, and recommandations.
  • Need evaluation criteria and more objective task evaluation.
  • ELM 8
  • Good finding of interface problems.
  • No comparison with old system.
  • No evaluation criteria.
  • Needs better reporting of results.
  • GTTSS
    (Backup)
    6
  • Report is too brief.
  • No motivation or evaluation criteria for questionnaire and tasks.
  • Tasks too simple.
  • No objective task data.
  • No comparison to prior system.
  • Minesweeper
    (Backup)
    8
  • Nice evaluation criteria.
  • Need more quantitative data and feedback.
  • OSCAR
    (Backup)
    8
  • Good evaluation criteria and comparison to previous.
  • Questionnaire results could be presented better.
  • Motivation on choosing click measure?
  • Motivation on tasks all not related to the main function of the system?
  • OSCAR-Web 8
  • Nice and thorough tasks and questionnaire.
  • Comparison to previous system would help.
  • Report is sloppy.
  • Solitaire
    (Backup)
    8
  • Good qualitative evaluation.
  • Quantitative data from questionnaires would help.
  • Evaluation criteria missing.
  • TotalScheduling
    (Backup)
    9
  • Nice objective and subjective comparison to previous system.
  • Report doesn't flow very well.
  • Need task motivation and evaluation criteria.
  • Win95Calculator
    (Backup)
    8
  • Good identification of interface problems.
  • Missing task and questionnaire motivation.
  • Need objective comparison to prior system.
  • Back to class home.