3.5 Prototype Conclusions

The interface we have proposed is obviously not complete, and our three prototypes will most likely raise some important questions about our design that had not occured to us before. In this section, we discuss the aspects of our design that we believe are good, and those which need more work.

To truly evaluate the success of our design, we need measurements such as can be obtained through usability testing. At this point, we have no such quantitative values, but there is still a way we can gauge our effort. In Phase I, we discussed what the problems with the current interface were, and included a list of several ways that we proposed to solve such problems. It will be instructive here to go back over that list to see how we did.

In general, then, we feel that our interface design is fairly well done. It is simple in appearance and usage, yet can be quite powerful in its functionality. In other words, the interface hides the complexities of the underlying system, which is always desirable in systems that will be used almost exclusively by novices and occasional users.

There are still improvements to be made, of course. If such a system were implemented today, it would suffer from the lack of completely reliable voice-recognition technology. Also, we did not meet our goal of providing a greater depth of information on products. We feel, though, that our advances in the areas of feedback to the customer, reduction of errors, and total user control make our interface design very desirable, and a great improvement over the current interface.


Back to top level

Back to Phase III index

On to Phase IV


Contact Information:
Doug Bowman
College of Computing
Georgia Institute of Technology
801 Atlantic Drive
Atlanta, GA 30332
email: bowman@cc.gatech.edu