Notes om Benyon and Murray, written by Catherine Albers

Most discussion took place around the issue of whether comparative or
non-comparative analysis was "better"/ more valuable

The comparison was biased by the screen

Comparability is easily confounded by many factors

Points up the need for long-term studies

If the metrics for evaluating adaptive systems are good then is adaptivity good

System and user can chase each other with adaptations

Is it valuable to provide a baseline set back to an initial interface

Measuring adaptation execution is different from measuring usability

What is the basis of comparison for usability

Usability is different from user satisfaction

Technology has secondary effects which must be kept in mind during design

Participatory design v. usability testing:  is one "better"

Evolving v. adaptive interface design

Iterative interface development cycle