$Revision: 1.6 $, $Date: 1997/01/10 16:06:07 $, $Author: clayton $

@string{cmu     = "Carnegie Mellon University"}
@string{pipe    = "Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}
@string{pot     = "Proceedings of the "}
@string{sei     = "Software Engineering Institute"}

@InProceedings{smdiasrr,
  author       = "David Eichmann",
  title        = "Supporting multiple domains in a single reuse repository",
  booktitle    = pot # "Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering
		  and Knowledge Engineering",
  year         = 1992,
  pages        = "164--169",
  address      = "Capri, Italy",
  month        = "15--20 June",
  keywords     = "software reusability, software tools",
  location     = "QA76.758 .I567X 1992",
  abstract     = "Domain analysis typically results in the construction of a
		  domain-specific repository. Such a repository imposes
		  artificial boundaries on the sharing of similar assets
		  between related domains. A lattice-based approach to
		  repository modeling can preserve a reuser's domain specific
		  view of the repository, while avoiding replication of
		  commonly used assets and supporting a more general
		  perspective on domain interrelationships"
}

@InProceedings{qffrapldaaoose,
  author       = "Sita Ramakrishnan",
  title        = "Quality factors for resource allocation problems-linking
		  domain analysis and object-oriented software engineering",
  booktitle    = pot # "First International Conference on Software Testing,
		  Reliability and Quality Assurance (STRQA'94)",
  year         = 1995,
  pages        = "68--72",
  address      = "New Delhi, India",
  month        = "21--22 December",
  keywords     = "object-oriented methods, resource allocation, software
		  quality",
  location     = "QA 76.76.T48 I57X 1994",
  abstract     = "The paper presents the quality factors that were addressed
		  indesigning an object-oriented framework for a class of
		  resource allocation problems. The paper discusses the
		  interplay between domain analysis and object-oriented
		  software engineering in the context of defining external and
		  internal qualities for that software system and describes the
		  process of system development."
}

@InProceedings{daear,
  author       = "Guillermo Arango and Eric Schoen and Robert Pettengill",
  title        = "Design as Evolution and Reuse",
  booktitle    = pot # "Second International Workshop on Software Reusability
		  (IWSR-2)",
  year         = 1993,
  pages        = "9--18",
  address      = "Lucca, Italy",
  month        = "24--26 March",
  keywords     = "knowledge based systems, software reusability, systems
		  analysis",
  location     = "QA 76.76.R47 I59 1993",
  abstract     = "The dominant activity in industrial software development is
		  design evolution.  Designers spend a great deal of their time
		  trying to understand how and why existing systems work in
		  order to change them reliably.  The approach commonly used,
		  understanding-through-discover, is inherently inefficient and
		  risky.  Substantial improvements in quality and productivity
		  are possible when designers operate in an information
		  workspace with low-cost access to reusable analysis and
		  design knowledge.  Software reusability, if appropriate, is a
		  natural consequence of the reuse of analysis and designs.  We
		  have developed and validated a process for constructing such
		  workspaces to support the design and evolution of product
		  families.  The process involves three related efforts: (i)
		  techniques to consolidate critical analysis and design
		  information - domain analysis; (ii) organization of the
		  information in structured form - technology books; and (iii)
		  methods and tools to reuse information.  We have already
		  benefited from applying the process and methodology described
		  in this paper with minimal computer support.  We conclude
		  that: (i) a process for consolidating and reusing design
		  knowledge is powerful by itself, and (ii) in our engineering
		  domains, the reuse of analyses and designs is more useful
		  than the reuse of software."
}

@InProceedings{erwgdss,
  author       = "Steven D. Fraser and Clifford S. Saunders",
  title        = "Enhanced Reuse with Group Decision Support Systems",
  booktitle    = pot # "Second International Workshop on Software Reusability
		  (IWSR-2)",
  year         = 1993,
  pages        = "168--175",
  address      = "Lucca, Italy",
  month        = "24--26 March",
  keywords     = "domain analysis, group decision support systems, groupware,
		  interpretative structural modeling, software reuse",
  location     = "QA 76.76.R47 I59 1993",
  abstract     = "The application of group decision support systems (GDSSs) to
		  domain analysis is proposed so that domain analysis may
		  become a more effectiveteam activity. In a large complex
		  software project, the problems of scale due to the
		  interaction of individuals as team members and the
		  interaction of teams with teams tend to limit the overall
		  effectiveness of an organization. A systematic approach to
		  facilitating these interactions is described. The GDSS
		  methodology used is based on interpretive structural
		  modeling, developed by J.N. Warfield in his 1976 book."
}

@TechReport{jiawgoodam,
  author       = "Robert Holibraugh",
  title        = "Joint Integrated Avionics Working Group ({JIAWG})
		  Object-Oriented Domain Analysis Method ({JODA})",
  institution  = sei # ", " # cmu,
  year         = 1992,
  type         = "Special Report",
  number       = "SEI-92-SR-3",
  address      = pipe,
  month        = nov,
  keywords     = "domain analysis, object-oriented analysis",
  location     = "/ftp.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/92.reports/ps/sr03.92.ps",
  abstract     = "The Joint Integrated Avionics Working Group (JIAWG) Reuse
		  Subcommittee has initiatives in several areas to demonstrate
		  that reuse can effectively support the JIAWG programs, and
		  the creation of reusable assets is an essential element of
		  reuse. Domain analysis is the process that identifies what is
		  reusable, how it can be structured, and how it can be used.
		  This report describes a method for domain analysis that is
		  based on Coad and Yourdon's {"Object Oriented Analysis."}
		  This method, the JIAWG Object-Oriented Domain Analysis
		  (JODA), includes several enhancements to the method of Coad
		  and Yourdon and produces a domain model to support asset
		  creation and reuse."
}

@Article{atatpos,
  author       = "T. R. Gruber",
  title        = "A translation approach to portable ontology specifications",
  journal      = "Knowledge Acquisition",
  year         = 1993,
  volume       = 5,
  number       = 2,
  pages        = "199-220",
  month        = jun,
  keywords     = "formal specification, knowledge representation, language
		  translation, software portability, vocabulary", 
  location     = "http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/ontolingua-intro.ps",
  abstract     = "To support the sharing and reuse of formally represented
		  knowledge among AI systems, it is useful to define the common
		  vocabulary in which shared knowledge is represented. A
		  specification of a representational vocabulary for a shared
		  domain of discourse-definitions of classes, relations,
		  functions, and other objects-is called an ontology. This
		  paper describes a mechanism for defining ontologies that are
		  portable over representation systems. Definitions written in
		  a standard format for predicate calculus are translated by a
		  system called Ontolingua into specialized representations,
		  including frame-based systems as well as relational
		  languages. This allows researchers to share and reuse
		  ontologies, while retaining the computational benefits of
		  specialized implementations. The author discusses how the
		  translation approach to portability addresses several
		  technical problems. One problem is how to accommodate the
		  stylistic and organizational differences among
		  representations while preserving declarative content. Another
		  is how to translate from a very expressive language into
		  restricted languages, remaining system-independent while
		  preserving the computational efficiency of implemented
		  systems. The author describes how these problems are
		  addressed by basing Ontolingua itself on an ontology of
		  domain-independent, representational idioms."
}

@Article{rvvanlp,
  author       = "Sastry Nanduri and Spencer Rugaber",
  title        = "Requirements validation via automated natural language
		  parsing",
  journal      = "Journal of Management Information Systems",
  year         = 1995,
  volume       = 12,
  number       = 3,
  pages        = "9--19",
  month        = "Winter",
  keywords     = "formal verification, natural language parsers, grammars,
		  management information systems, natural languages,
		  object-oriented methods", 
  location     = "T 58.6.J683X"
}

@Manual{rug,
  title        = "{\sc Refine} User's Guide",
  organization = "Reasoning Systems, Inc",
  address      = paca,
  edition      = "25 May 1990",
  month        = may
}