LCC 8130A, CS 8113N, Psy 7011C. Cognitive Models of Science: Philosophical Perspectives.
Nersessian.
DESCRIPTION
We will examine to what extent models of human reasoning and
representation proposed in the cognitive sciences can provide the
basis for an enriched, more nuanced understanding of the nature
and development of science. The focus of the course will be on
the cognitive models of science proposed by philosophers. Some
analyses by psychologists and AI researchers will also be
considered. We will address such questions as: By constructing
cognitive models, can we better understand how scientists devise
and execute real world and thought experiments, construct
arguments, create concepts, invent and use mathematical tools,
communicate ideas and practices, train practitioners? Can
theories and methods in the cognitive sciences provide a means
for reconstruction of historical "discovery processes"? What
area(s) of cognitive science offer the most potential for
fruitful analyses: AI, psychology, or cognitive neuroscience?
Can the cognitive practices of scientists inform us about
learning in science education? What is the relation between
cognitive and social models of science? Do cognitive analyses
require abandoning traditional philosophical concerns with
rationality and objectivity?
REQUIREMENTS
There will be a significant amount of reading. All students,
including those registered for "audit" credit, will make several
joint presentations. Those students requiring a letter grade
will do an individual or joint research project/paper of their
choosing.
TEXTS
M. DeMey: The Cognitive Paradigm (U. of Chicago, 1992)
R. Giere: Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach (U. of Chicago, 1988)
R. Giere, ed: Cognitive Models of Science (U. of Minnesota, 1992)
P. Churchland: A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science (MIT, 1989)
P. Thagard: Conceptual Revolutions (Princeton, 1992)