Group G40 "How Browser Was Obtained" (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 829 17.3 30.6 HW Bundle Q29 532 11.1 19.6 SW Bundle Q30 596 12.4 22.0 Free Q31 1750 36.4 64.6 Evaluation Q32 189 3.9 7.0 Download Q33 113 2.4 4.2 Retail Q34 84 1.7 3.1 Catalog Q35 16 .3 .6 Other method Q36 106 2.2 3.9 Company Q37 383 8.0 14.1 School Q38 124 2.6 4.6 Other Q39 42 .9 1.5 Don't know Q40 41 .9 1.5 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 4805 100.0 177.3 0 missing cases; 2,710 valid cases
X1: . Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 10 17.2 29.4 HW Bundle Q29 5 8.6 14.7 SW Bundle Q30 3 5.2 8.8 Free Q31 20 34.5 58.8 Evaluation Q32 4 6.9 11.8 Download Q33 2 3.4 5.9 Retail Q34 2 3.4 5.9 Catalog Q35 2 3.4 5.9 Other method Q36 1 1.7 2.9 Company Q37 3 5.2 8.8 School Q38 1 1.7 2.9 Other Q39 2 3.4 5.9 Don't know Q40 3 5.2 8.8 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 58 100.0 170.6 0 missing cases; 34 valid cases X1: 1 USA Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 744 18.9 33.7 HW Bundle Q29 456 11.6 20.7 SW Bundle Q30 507 12.9 23.0 Free Q31 1386 35.2 62.8 Evaluation Q32 142 3.6 6.4 Download Q33 96 2.4 4.3 Retail Q34 75 1.9 3.4 Catalog Q35 11 .3 .5 Other method Q36 72 1.8 3.3 Company Q37 291 7.4 13.2 School Q38 91 2.3 4.1 Other Q39 29 .7 1.3 Don't know Q40 33 .8 1.5 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 3933 100.0 178.2 0 missing cases; 2,207 valid cases X1: 2 Europe Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 32 8.1 14.2 HW Bundle Q29 35 8.9 15.6 SW Bundle Q30 43 10.9 19.1 Free Q31 161 40.9 71.6 Evaluation Q32 24 6.1 10.7 Download Q33 5 1.3 2.2 Retail Q34 1 .3 .4 Catalog Q35 1 .3 .4 Other method Q36 17 4.3 7.6 Company Q37 46 11.7 20.4 School Q38 18 4.6 8.0 Other Q39 7 1.8 3.1 Don't know Q40 4 1.0 1.8 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 394 100.0 175.1 0 missing cases; 225 valid cases X1: 3 Other Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 43 10.2 17.6 HW Bundle Q29 36 8.6 14.8 SW Bundle Q30 43 10.2 17.6 Free Q31 183 43.6 75.0 Evaluation Q32 19 4.5 7.8 Download Q33 10 2.4 4.1 Retail Q34 6 1.4 2.5 Catalog Q35 2 .5 .8 Other method Q36 16 3.8 6.6 Company Q37 43 10.2 17.6 School Q38 14 3.3 5.7 Other Q39 4 1.0 1.6 Don't know Q40 1 .2 .4 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 420 100.0 172.1 0 missing cases; 244 valid cases
X4: . Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 10 17.2 29.4 HW Bundle Q29 5 8.6 14.7 SW Bundle Q30 3 5.2 8.8 Free Q31 20 34.5 58.8 Evaluation Q32 4 6.9 11.8 Download Q33 2 3.4 5.9 Retail Q34 2 3.4 5.9 Catalog Q35 2 3.4 5.9 Other method Q36 1 1.7 2.9 Company Q37 3 5.2 8.8 School Q38 1 1.7 2.9 Other Q39 2 3.4 5.9 Don't know Q40 3 5.2 8.8 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 58 100.0 170.6 0 missing cases; 34 valid cases X4: 1.00 Female Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 274 20.5 35.5 HW Bundle Q29 183 13.7 23.7 SW Bundle Q30 167 12.5 21.6 Free Q31 402 30.0 52.1 Evaluation Q32 37 2.8 4.8 Download Q33 20 1.5 2.6 Retail Q34 25 1.9 3.2 Catalog Q35 4 .3 .5 Other method Q36 18 1.3 2.3 Company Q37 137 10.2 17.7 School Q38 40 3.0 5.2 Other Q39 11 .8 1.4 Don't know Q40 20 1.5 2.6 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 1338 100.0 173.3 0 missing cases; 772 valid cases X4: 2.00 Male Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 545 16.0 28.6 HW Bundle Q29 344 10.1 18.1 SW Bundle Q30 426 12.5 22.4 Free Q31 1328 39.0 69.7 Evaluation Q32 148 4.3 7.8 Download Q33 91 2.7 4.8 Retail Q34 57 1.7 3.0 Catalog Q35 10 .3 .5 Other method Q36 87 2.6 4.6 Company Q37 243 7.1 12.8 School Q38 83 2.4 4.4 Other Q39 29 .9 1.5 Don't know Q40 18 .5 .9 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 3409 100.0 179.0 0 missing cases; 1,904 valid cases
X2: . Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 31 22.3 41.9 HW Bundle Q29 18 12.9 24.3 SW Bundle Q30 10 7.2 13.5 Free Q31 44 31.7 59.5 Evaluation Q32 7 5.0 9.5 Download Q33 3 2.2 4.1 Retail Q34 5 3.6 6.8 Catalog Q35 2 1.4 2.7 Other method Q36 5 3.6 6.8 Company Q37 5 3.6 6.8 School Q38 2 1.4 2.7 Other Q39 3 2.2 4.1 Don't know Q40 4 2.9 5.4 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 139 100.0 187.8 0 missing cases; 74 valid cases X2: 1 11-20 Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 40 14.7 28.8 HW Bundle Q29 29 10.7 20.9 SW Bundle Q30 34 12.5 24.5 Free Q31 109 40.1 78.4 Evaluation Q32 9 3.3 6.5 Retail Q34 2 .7 1.4 Catalog Q35 1 .4 .7 Other method Q36 10 3.7 7.2 Company Q37 7 2.6 5.0 School Q38 22 8.1 15.8 Other Q39 3 1.1 2.2 Don't know Q40 6 2.2 4.3 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 272 100.0 195.7 0 missing cases; 139 valid cases X2: 2 21-25 Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 78 12.9 23.4 HW Bundle Q29 56 9.3 16.8 SW Bundle Q30 68 11.2 20.4 Free Q31 238 39.3 71.5 Evaluation Q32 24 4.0 7.2 Download Q33 10 1.7 3.0 Retail Q34 5 .8 1.5 Catalog Q35 1 .2 .3 Other method Q36 20 3.3 6.0 Company Q37 46 7.6 13.8 School Q38 49 8.1 14.7 Other Q39 6 1.0 1.8 Don't know Q40 4 .7 1.2 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 605 100.0 181.7 0 missing cases; 333 valid cases X2: 3 26-50 Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 501 16.4 29.2 HW Bundle Q29 344 11.3 20.1 SW Bundle Q30 392 12.8 22.9 Free Q31 1133 37.1 66.1 Evaluation Q32 128 4.2 7.5 Download Q33 72 2.4 4.2 Retail Q34 48 1.6 2.8 Catalog Q35 7 .2 .4 Other method Q36 52 1.7 3.0 Company Q37 289 9.5 16.9 School Q38 43 1.4 2.5 Other Q39 28 .9 1.6 Don't know Q40 16 .5 .9 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 3053 100.0 178.1 0 missing cases; 1,714 valid cases X2: 4 50+ Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 179 24.3 39.8 HW Bundle Q29 85 11.5 18.9 SW Bundle Q30 92 12.5 20.4 Free Q31 226 30.7 50.2 Evaluation Q32 21 2.9 4.7 Download Q33 28 3.8 6.2 Retail Q34 24 3.3 5.3 Catalog Q35 5 .7 1.1 Other method Q36 19 2.6 4.2 Company Q37 36 4.9 8.0 School Q38 8 1.1 1.8 Other Q39 2 .3 .4 Don't know Q40 11 1.5 2.4 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 736 100.0 163.6 0 missing cases; 450 valid cases
X3: . Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 10 17.2 29.4 HW Bundle Q29 5 8.6 14.7 SW Bundle Q30 3 5.2 8.8 Free Q31 20 34.5 58.8 Evaluation Q32 4 6.9 11.8 Download Q33 2 3.4 5.9 Retail Q34 2 3.4 5.9 Catalog Q35 2 3.4 5.9 Other method Q36 1 1.7 2.9 Company Q37 3 5.2 8.8 School Q38 1 1.7 2.9 Other Q39 2 3.4 5.9 Don't know Q40 3 5.2 8.8 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 58 100.0 170.6 0 missing cases; 34 valid cases X3: 1 <1 Year Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 110 31.9 45.8 HW Bundle Q29 68 19.7 28.3 SW Bundle Q30 52 15.1 21.7 Free Q31 63 18.3 26.3 Evaluation Q32 5 1.4 2.1 Download Q33 3 .9 1.3 Retail Q34 10 2.9 4.2 Other method Q36 6 1.7 2.5 Company Q37 10 2.9 4.2 School Q38 2 .6 .8 Other Q39 3 .9 1.3 Don't know Q40 13 3.8 5.4 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 345 100.0 143.8 0 missing cases; 240 valid cases X3: 2 1-3 Years Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 303 21.4 36.8 HW Bundle Q29 177 12.5 21.5 SW Bundle Q30 183 12.9 22.2 Free Q31 452 31.9 54.9 Evaluation Q32 41 2.9 5.0 Download Q33 34 2.4 4.1 Retail Q34 37 2.6 4.5 Catalog Q35 5 .4 .6 Other method Q36 33 2.3 4.0 Company Q37 92 6.5 11.2 School Q38 32 2.3 3.9 Other Q39 10 .7 1.2 Don't know Q40 18 1.3 2.2 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 1417 100.0 172.0 0 missing cases; 824 valid cases X3: 3 >4 Years Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 406 13.6 25.2 HW Bundle Q29 282 9.4 17.5 SW Bundle Q30 358 12.0 22.2 Free Q31 1215 40.7 75.4 Evaluation Q32 139 4.7 8.6 Download Q33 74 2.5 4.6 Retail Q34 35 1.2 2.2 Catalog Q35 9 .3 .6 Other method Q36 66 2.2 4.1 Company Q37 278 9.3 17.2 School Q38 89 3.0 5.5 Other Q39 27 .9 1.7 Don't know Q40 7 .2 .4 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 2985 100.0 185.2 0 missing cases; 1,612 valid cases
X6: . Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 10 17.2 29.4 HW Bundle Q29 5 8.6 14.7 SW Bundle Q30 3 5.2 8.8 Free Q31 20 34.5 58.8 Evaluation Q32 4 6.9 11.8 Download Q33 2 3.4 5.9 Retail Q34 2 3.4 5.9 Catalog Q35 2 3.4 5.9 Other method Q36 1 1.7 2.9 Company Q37 3 5.2 8.8 School Q38 1 1.7 2.9 Other Q39 2 3.4 5.9 Don't know Q40 3 5.2 8.8 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 58 100.0 170.6 0 missing cases; 34 valid cases X6: 1 Novice Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 119 32.2 46.5 HW Bundle Q29 56 15.2 21.9 SW Bundle Q30 51 13.8 19.9 Free Q31 53 14.4 20.7 Evaluation Q32 2 .5 .8 Download Q33 6 1.6 2.3 Retail Q34 12 3.3 4.7 Catalog Q35 2 .5 .8 Other method Q36 7 1.9 2.7 Company Q37 24 6.5 9.4 School Q38 10 2.7 3.9 Other Q39 5 1.4 2.0 Don't know Q40 22 6.0 8.6 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 369 100.0 144.1 0 missing cases; 256 valid cases X6: 2 Intermediate Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 286 24.3 40.0 HW Bundle Q29 141 12.0 19.7 SW Bundle Q30 150 12.7 21.0 Free Q31 353 29.9 49.4 Evaluation Q32 24 2.0 3.4 Download Q33 20 1.7 2.8 Retail Q34 24 2.0 3.4 Catalog Q35 6 .5 .8 Other method Q36 22 1.9 3.1 Company Q37 93 7.9 13.0 School Q38 36 3.1 5.0 Other Q39 10 .8 1.4 Don't know Q40 14 1.2 2.0 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 1179 100.0 164.9 0 missing cases; 715 valid cases X6: 3 Experienced Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 288 13.9 25.6 HW Bundle Q29 229 11.0 20.4 SW Bundle Q30 256 12.3 22.8 Free Q31 837 40.3 74.5 Evaluation Q32 99 4.8 8.8 Download Q33 50 2.4 4.4 Retail Q34 31 1.5 2.8 Catalog Q35 5 .2 .4 Other method Q36 45 2.2 4.0 Company Q37 172 8.3 15.3 School Q38 50 2.4 4.4 Other Q39 15 .7 1.3 Don't know Q40 2 .1 .2 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 2079 100.0 185.0 0 missing cases; 1,124 valid cases X6: 4 Expert Group G40 How Browser Was Obtained (Value tabulated = 1) Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Name Count Responses Cases ISP Q28 126 11.3 21.7 HW Bundle Q29 101 9.0 17.4 SW Bundle Q30 136 12.1 23.4 Free Q31 487 43.5 83.8 Evaluation Q32 60 5.4 10.3 Download Q33 35 3.1 6.0 Retail Q34 15 1.3 2.6 Catalog Q35 1 .1 .2 Other method Q36 31 2.8 5.3 Company Q37 91 8.1 15.7 School Q38 27 2.4 4.6 Other Q39 10 .9 1.7 ------- ----- ----- Total responses 1120 100.0 192.8 0 missing cases; 581 valid cases
For more information or to submit comments:
send email to www-survey@cc.gatech.edu.
GVU's WWW Surveying Team
Graphics, Visualization, & Usability Center
College of Computing
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332-0280